Visual anomaly detection without reference in graphics computing environments

ABSTRACT

A mechanism is described for facilitating visual anomaly detection without reference in computing environments. An apparatus of embodiments, as described herein, includes one or more processors to select a frame from a sequence of multiple frames associated with a video stream captured by a camera, and dynamically compute a frame confidence score for the frame based on frame training data associated with frame. The one or more processors are further to detect one or more anomalies in the frame when the frame confidence score is less than a frame confidence threshold associated with the frame, where detecting includes dynamically comparing the frame confidence score with the frame confidence threshold through inference using frame field data and the frame training data.

RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of and priority to the U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/676,645, entitled NO REFERENCE VISUAL ANOMALY DETECTION SYSTEM FOR GRAPHICS PLATFORM VALIDATION, by Muppalla, et al., filed on May 25, 2018, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD

Embodiments described herein generally relate to computers. More particularly, embodiments are described for facilitating visual anomaly detection without reference in graphics computing environments.

BACKGROUND

Conventional techniques for detecting video corruptions rely on human eyes, trained engineers, or contingent workers to look at monitor displays to identify anomalies in visual presentations. Further, conventional techniques are either manual or reference-based that require manual examination or exact reference contents, respectively, that are then replayed using a test system so the findings may then be compared with other known results. Such conventional techniques for detection of visual anomalies are prone to error due to human participation in performing tasks, where, for example, a person is easily distracted and misses out of certain corruptions on the screen. Similarly, the exact labeling of complicated cases caused by subtle corruptions depends on various engineers and thus different engineers could often label the same image or video differently. Naturally, there is a time-limit to how long an engineer could work on identifying various corruptions, which often leads to efficiency and inaccurate results.

These manual or reference-based conventional techniques lack scalability and non-comprehensive testing, because real-world content is not fixed, which, in turn, means expected good outputs cannot be pre-profiled to compare against test outputs in a scalable manner. For example, contents of computer-games and websites are not static as they keep evolving and often include randomness, such as in selection of advertisements that appear at the beginning of or in probabilistic outcomes of action games.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a processing system, according to an embodiment.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a processor having one or more processor cores, an integrated memory controller, and an integrated graphics processor.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a graphics processor, which may be a discrete graphics processing unit, or may be a graphics processor integrated with a plurality of processing cores.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a graphics processing engine of a graphics processor in accordance with some embodiments.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of hardware logic of a graphics processor core according to some embodiments.

FIG. 6A-6B illustrate thread execution logic including an array of processing elements employed in a graphics processor core according to some embodiments.

FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating a graphics processor instruction formats according to some embodiments.

FIG. 8 is a block diagram of another embodiment of a graphics processor.

FIG. 9A is a block diagram illustrating a graphics processor command format according to an embodiment.

FIG. 9B is a block diagram illustrating a graphics processor command sequence according to an embodiment.

FIG. 10 illustrates exemplary graphics software architecture for a data processing system according to some embodiments.

FIG. 11A is a block diagram illustrating an IP core development system that may be used to manufacture an integrated circuit to perform operations according to an embodiment.

FIG. 11B illustrates a cross-section side view of an integrated circuit package assembly according to some embodiments.

FIG. 12 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary system on a chip integrated circuit that may be fabricated using one or more IP cores, according to an embodiment.

FIGS. 13A-13B are block diagrams illustrating exemplary graphics processors for use within an System on Chip (SoC), according to embodiments described herein.

FIGS. 14A-14B illustrate additional exemplary graphics processor logic according to embodiments described herein.

FIG. 15 is a generalized diagram of a machine learning software stack.

FIG. 16A illustrates various layers with a convolutional neural network (CNN).

FIG. 16B illustrates computation stages within a convolutional layer of a CNN.

FIG. 17 illustrates an exemplary recurrent neural network.

FIG. 18 illustrates training and deployment of a deep neural network.

FIG. 19 is a block diagram illustrating distributed learning.

FIG. 20 illustrates a computing device hosting a no-reference anomaly detection mechanism and one or more no-reference anomaly detection components according to one embodiment.

FIG. 21 illustrates the no-reference anomaly detection mechanism and the one or more no-reference anomaly detection components of FIG. 20 according to one embodiment.

FIG. 22A-22H illustrate types of corruption in images/video according to one embodiment.

FIG. 23A illustrates an end-to-end method for no-reference detection of anomalies in videos/images according to one embodiment.

FIG. 23B illustrates a deep learning-based single frame technique for detection of corruption in images/videos according to one embodiment.

FIG. 23C illustrates a deep learning-based sequence of frames technique for detection of corruption in images/videos according to one embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth. However, embodiments, as described herein, may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known circuits, structures and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure the understanding of this description.

Embodiments provide for a novel technique for facilitating automated no-reference detection of anomalies in video screens, such as detecting visual corruption in video streams as seen on display screens. For example, this novel technique offers a reliable non-reference-based solution to identify anomalies in video streams that is automated and provides for a robust validation of graphics platforms.

It is contemplated that terms like “request”, “query”, “job”, “work”, “work item”, and “workload” may be referenced interchangeably throughout this document. Similarly, an “application” or “agent” may refer to or include a computer program, a software application, a game, a workstation application, etc., offered through an application programming interface (API), such as a free rendering API, such as Open Graphics Library (OpenGL®), Open Computing Language (OpenCL®), CUDA®, DirectX® 11, DirectX® 12, etc., where “dispatch” may be interchangeably referred to as “work unit” or “draw” and similarly, “application” may be interchangeably referred to as “workflow” or simply “agent”. For example, a workload, such as that of a three-dimensional (3D) game, may include and issue any number and type of “frames” where each frame may represent an image (e.g., sailboat, human face). Further, each frame may include and offer any number and type of work units, where each work unit may represent a part (e.g., mast of sailboat, forehead of human face) of the image (e.g., sailboat, human face) represented by its corresponding frame. However, for the sake of consistency, each item may be referenced by a single term (e.g., “dispatch”, “agent”, etc.) throughout this document.

In some embodiments, terms like “display screen” and “display surface” may be used interchangeably referring to the visible portion of a display device while the rest of the display device may be embedded into a computing device, such as a smartphone, a wearable device, etc. It is contemplated and to be noted that embodiments are not limited to any particular computing device, software application, hardware component, display device, display screen or surface, protocol, standard, etc. For example, embodiments may be applied to and used with any number and type of real-time applications on any number and type of computers, such as desktops, laptops, tablet computers, smartphones, head-mounted displays and other wearable devices, and/or the like. Further, for example, rendering scenarios for efficient performance using this novel technique may range from simple scenarios, such as desktop compositing, to complex scenarios, such as 3D games, augmented reality applications, etc.

System Overview

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a processing system 100, according to an embodiment. In various embodiments the system 100 includes one or more processors 102 and one or more graphics processors 108, and may be a single processor desktop system, a multiprocessor workstation system, or a server system having a large number of processors 102 or processor cores 107. In one embodiment, the system 100 is a processing platform incorporated within a system-on-a-chip (SoC) integrated circuit for use in mobile, handheld, or embedded devices.

In one embodiment the system 100 can include, or be incorporated within a server-based gaming platform, a game console, including a game and media console, a mobile gaming console, a handheld game console, or an online game console. In some embodiments the system 100 is a mobile phone, smart phone, tablet computing device or mobile Internet device. The processing system 100 can also include, couple with, or be integrated within a wearable device, such as a smart watch wearable device, smart eyewear device, augmented reality device, or virtual reality device. In some embodiments, the processing system 100 is a television or set top box device having one or more processors 102 and a graphical interface generated by one or more graphics processors 108.

In some embodiments, the one or more processors 102 each include one or more processor cores 107 to process instructions which, when executed, perform operations for system and user software. In some embodiments, each of the one or more processor cores 107 is configured to process a specific instruction set 109. In some embodiments, instruction set 109 may facilitate Complex Instruction Set Computing (CISC), Reduced Instruction Set Computing (RISC), or computing via a Very Long Instruction Word (VLIW). Multiple processor cores 107 may each process a different instruction set 109, which may include instructions to facilitate the emulation of other instruction sets. Processor core 107 may also include other processing devices, such a Digital Signal Processor (DSP).

In some embodiments, the processor 102 includes cache memory 104. Depending on the architecture, the processor 102 can have a single internal cache or multiple levels of internal cache. In some embodiments, the cache memory is shared among various components of the processor 102. In some embodiments, the processor 102 also uses an external cache (e.g., a Level-3 (L3) cache or Last Level Cache (LLC)) (not shown), which may be shared among processor cores 107 using known cache coherency techniques. A register file 106 is additionally included in processor 102 which may include different types of registers for storing different types of data (e.g., integer registers, floating point registers, status registers, and an instruction pointer register). Some registers may be general-purpose registers, while other registers may be specific to the design of the processor 102.

In some embodiments, one or more processor(s) 102 are coupled with one or more interface bus(es) 110 to transmit communication signals such as address, data, or control signals between processor 102 and other components in the system 100. The interface bus 110, in one embodiment, can be a processor bus, such as a version of the Direct Media Interface (DMI) bus. However, processor busses are not limited to the DMI bus, and may include one or more Peripheral Component Interconnect buses (e.g., PCI, PCI Express), memory busses, or other types of interface busses. In one embodiment the processor(s) 102 include an integrated memory controller 116 and a platform controller hub 130. The memory controller 116 facilitates communication between a memory device and other components of the system 100, while the platform controller hub (PCH) 130 provides connections to I/O devices via a local I/O bus.

The memory device 120 can be a dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) device, a static random-access memory (SRAM) device, flash memory device, phase-change memory device, or some other memory device having suitable performance to serve as process memory. In one embodiment the memory device 120 can operate as system memory for the system 100, to store data 122 and instructions 121 for use when the one or more processors 102 executes an application or process. Memory controller 116 also couples with an optional external graphics processor 112, which may communicate with the one or more graphics processors 108 in processors 102 to perform graphics and media operations. In some embodiments a display device 111 can connect to the processor(s) 102. The display device 111 can be one or more of an internal display device, as in a mobile electronic device or a laptop device or an external display device attached via a display interface (e.g., DisplayPort, etc.). In one embodiment the display device 111 can be a head mounted display (HMD) such as a stereoscopic display device for use in virtual reality (VR) applications or augmented reality (AR) applications.

In some embodiments the platform controller hub 130 enables peripherals to connect to memory device 120 and processor 102 via a high-speed I/O bus. The I/O peripherals include, but are not limited to, an audio controller 146, a network controller 134, a firmware interface 128, a wireless transceiver 126, touch sensors 125, a data storage device 124 (e.g., hard disk drive, flash memory, etc.). The data storage device 124 can connect via a storage interface (e.g., SATA) or via a peripheral bus, such as a Peripheral Component Interconnect bus (e.g., PCI, PCI Express). The touch sensors 125 can include touch screen sensors, pressure sensors, or fingerprint sensors. The wireless transceiver 126 can be a Wi-Fi transceiver, a Bluetooth transceiver, or a mobile network transceiver such as a 3G, 4G, or Long-Term Evolution (LTE) transceiver. The firmware interface 128 enables communication with system firmware, and can be, for example, a unified extensible firmware interface (UEFI). The network controller 134 can enable a network connection to a wired network. In some embodiments, a high-performance network controller (not shown) couples with the interface bus 110. The audio controller 146, in one embodiment, is a multi-channel high definition audio controller. In one embodiment the system 100 includes an optional legacy I/O controller 140 for coupling legacy (e.g., Personal System 2 (PS/2)) devices to the system. The platform controller hub 130 can also connect to one or more Universal Serial Bus (USB) controllers 142 connect input devices, such as keyboard and mouse 143 combinations, a camera 144, or other USB input devices.

It will be appreciated that the system 100 shown is exemplary and not limiting, as other types of data processing systems that are differently configured may also be used. For example, an instance of the memory controller 116 and platform controller hub 130 may be integrated into a discreet external graphics processor, such as the external graphics processor 112. In one embodiment the platform controller hub 130 and/or memory controller 160 may be external to the one or more processor(s) 102. For example, the system 100 can include an external memory controller 116 and platform controller hub 130, which may be configured as a memory controller hub and peripheral controller hub within a system chipset that is in communication with the processor(s) 102.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a processor 200 having one or more processor cores 202A-202N, an integrated memory controller 214, and an integrated graphics processor 208. Those elements of FIG. 2 having the same reference numbers (or names) as the elements of any other figure herein can operate or function in any manner similar to that described elsewhere herein, but are not limited to such. Processor 200 can include additional cores up to and including additional core 202N represented by the dashed lined boxes. Each of processor cores 202A-202N includes one or more internal cache units 204A-204N. In some embodiments each processor core also has access to one or more shared cached units 206.

The internal cache units 204A-204N and shared cache units 206 represent a cache memory hierarchy within the processor 200. The cache memory hierarchy may include at least one level of instruction and data cache within each processor core and one or more levels of shared mid-level cache, such as a Level 2 (L2), Level 3 (L3), Level 4 (L4), or other levels of cache, where the highest level of cache before external memory is classified as the LLC. In some embodiments, cache coherency logic maintains coherency between the various cache units 206 and 204A-204N.

In some embodiments, processor 200 may also include a set of one or more bus controller units 216 and a system agent core 210. The one or more bus controller units 216 manage a set of peripheral buses, such as one or more PCI or PCI express busses. System agent core 210 provides management functionality for the various processor components. In some embodiments, system agent core 210 includes one or more integrated memory controllers 214 to manage access to various external memory devices (not shown).

In some embodiments, one or more of the processor cores 202A-202N include support for simultaneous multi-threading. In such embodiment, the system agent core 210 includes components for coordinating and operating cores 202A-202N during multi-threaded processing. System agent core 210 may additionally include a power control unit (PCU), which includes logic and components to regulate the power state of processor cores 202A-202N and graphics processor 208.

In some embodiments, processor 200 additionally includes graphics processor 208 to execute graphics processing operations. In some embodiments, the graphics processor 208 couples with the set of shared cache units 206, and the system agent core 210, including the one or more integrated memory controllers 214. In some embodiments, the system agent core 210 also includes a display controller 211 to drive graphics processor output to one or more coupled displays. In some embodiments, display controller 211 may also be a separate module coupled with the graphics processor via at least one interconnect, or may be integrated within the graphics processor 208.

In some embodiments, a ring-based interconnect unit 212 is used to couple the internal components of the processor 200. However, an alternative interconnect unit may be used, such as a point-to-point interconnect, a switched interconnect, or other techniques, including techniques well known in the art. In some embodiments, graphics processor 208 couples with the ring interconnect 212 via an I/O link 213.

The exemplary I/O link 213 represents at least one of multiple varieties of I/O interconnects, including an on package I/O interconnect which facilitates communication between various processor components and a high-performance embedded memory module 218, such as an eDRAM module. In some embodiments, each of the processor cores 202A-202N and graphics processor 208 use embedded memory modules 218 as a shared Last Level Cache.

In some embodiments, processor cores 202A-202N are homogenous cores executing the same instruction set architecture. In another embodiment, processor cores 202A-202N are heterogeneous in terms of instruction set architecture (ISA), where one or more of processor cores 202A-202N execute a first instruction set, while at least one of the other cores executes a subset of the first instruction set or a different instruction set. In one embodiment processor cores 202A-202N are heterogeneous in terms of microarchitecture, where one or more cores having a relatively higher power consumption couple with one or more power cores having a lower power consumption. Additionally, processor 200 can be implemented on one or more chips or as an SoC integrated circuit having the illustrated components, in addition to other components.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a graphics processor 300, which may be a discrete graphics processing unit, or may be a graphics processor integrated with a plurality of processing cores. In some embodiments, the graphics processor communicates via a memory mapped I/O interface to registers on the graphics processor and with commands placed into the processor memory. In some embodiments, graphics processor 300 includes a memory interface 314 to access memory. Memory interface 314 can be an interface to local memory, one or more internal caches, one or more shared external caches, and/or to system memory.

In some embodiments, graphics processor 300 also includes a display controller 302 to drive display output data to a display device 320. Display controller 302 includes hardware for one or more overlay planes for the display and composition of multiple layers of video or user interface elements. The display device 320 can be an internal or external display device. In one embodiment the display device 320 is a head mounted display device, such as a virtual reality (VR) display device or an augmented reality (AR) display device. In some embodiments, graphics processor 300 includes a video codec engine 306 to encode, decode, or transcode media to, from, or between one or more media encoding formats, including, but not limited to Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG) formats such as MPEG-2, Advanced Video Coding (AVC) formats such as H.264/MPEG-4 AVC, as well as the Society of Motion Picture & Television Engineers (SMPTE) 421M/VC-1, and Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) formats such as JPEG, and Motion JPEG (MJPEG) formats.

In some embodiments, graphics processor 300 includes a block image transfer (BLIT) engine 304 to perform two-dimensional (2D) rasterizer operations including, for example, bit-boundary block transfers. However, in one embodiment, 2D graphics operations are performed using one or more components of graphics processing engine (GPE) 310. In some embodiments, GPE 310 is a compute engine for performing graphics operations, including three-dimensional (3D) graphics operations and media operations.

In some embodiments, GPE 310 includes a 3D pipeline 312 for performing 3D operations, such as rendering three-dimensional images and scenes using processing functions that act upon 3D primitive shapes (e.g., rectangle, triangle, etc.). The 3D pipeline 312 includes programmable and fixed function elements that perform various tasks within the element and/or spawn execution threads to a 3D/Media sub-system 315. While 3D pipeline 312 can be used to perform media operations, an embodiment of GPE 310 also includes a media pipeline 316 that is specifically used to perform media operations, such as video post-processing and image enhancement.

In some embodiments, media pipeline 316 includes fixed function or programmable logic units to perform one or more specialized media operations, such as video decode acceleration, video de-interlacing, and video encode acceleration in place of, or on behalf of video codec engine 306. In some embodiments, media pipeline 316 additionally includes a thread spawning unit to spawn threads for execution on 3D/Media sub-system 315. The spawned threads perform computations for the media operations on one or more graphics execution units included in 3D/Media sub-system 315.

In some embodiments, 3D/Media subsystem 315 includes logic for executing threads spawned by 3D pipeline 312 and media pipeline 316. In one embodiment, the pipelines send thread execution requests to 3D/Media subsystem 315, which includes thread dispatch logic for arbitrating and dispatching the various requests to available thread execution resources. The execution resources include an array of graphics execution units to process the 3D and media threads. In some embodiments, 3D/Media subsystem 315 includes one or more internal caches for thread instructions and data. In some embodiments, the subsystem also includes shared memory, including registers and addressable memory, to share data between threads and to store output data.

Graphics Processing Engine

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a graphics processing engine 410 of a graphics processor in accordance with some embodiments. In one embodiment, the graphics processing engine (GPE) 410 is a version of the GPE 310 shown in FIG. 3. Elements of FIG. 4 having the same reference numbers (or names) as the elements of any other figure herein can operate or function in any manner similar to that described elsewhere herein, but are not limited to such. For example, the 3D pipeline 312 and media pipeline 316 of FIG. 3 are illustrated. The media pipeline 316 is optional in some embodiments of the GPE 410 and may not be explicitly included within the GPE 410. For example, and in at least one embodiment, a separate media and/or image processor is coupled to the GPE 410.

In some embodiments, GPE 410 couples with or includes a command streamer 403, which provides a command stream to the 3D pipeline 312 and/or media pipelines 316. In some embodiments, command streamer 403 is coupled with memory, which can be system memory, or one or more of internal cache memory and shared cache memory. In some embodiments, command streamer 403 receives commands from the memory and sends the commands to 3D pipeline 312 and/or media pipeline 316. The commands are directives fetched from a ring buffer, which stores commands for the 3D pipeline 312 and media pipeline 316. In one embodiment, the ring buffer can additionally include batch command buffers storing batches of multiple commands. The commands for the 3D pipeline 312 can also include references to data stored in memory, such as but not limited to vertex and geometry data for the 3D pipeline 312 and/or image data and memory objects for the media pipeline 316. The 3D pipeline 312 and media pipeline 316 process the commands and data by performing operations via logic within the respective pipelines or by dispatching one or more execution threads to a graphics core array 414. In one embodiment the graphics core array 414 include one or more blocks of graphics cores (e.g., graphics core(s) 415A, graphics core(s) 415B), each block including one or more graphics cores. Each graphics core includes a set of graphics execution resources that includes general-purpose and graphics specific execution logic to perform graphics and compute operations, as well as fixed function texture processing and/or machine learning and artificial intelligence acceleration logic.

In various embodiments the 3D pipeline 312 includes fixed function and programmable logic to process one or more shader programs, such as vertex shaders, geometry shaders, pixel shaders, fragment shaders, compute shaders, or other shader programs, by processing the instructions and dispatching execution threads to the graphics core array 414. The graphics core array 414 provides a unified block of execution resources for use in processing these shader programs. Multi-purpose execution logic (e.g., execution units) within the graphics core(s) 415A-414B of the graphic core array 414 includes support for various 3D API shader languages and can execute multiple simultaneous execution threads associated with multiple shaders.

In some embodiments the graphics core array 414 also includes execution logic to perform media functions, such as video and/or image processing. In one embodiment, the execution units additionally include general-purpose logic that is programmable to perform parallel general-purpose computational operations, in addition to graphics processing operations. The general-purpose logic can perform processing operations in parallel or in conjunction with general-purpose logic within the processor core(s) 107 of FIG. 1 or core 202A-202N as in FIG. 2.

Output data generated by threads executing on the graphics core array 414 can output data to memory in a unified return buffer (URB) 418. The URB 418 can store data for multiple threads. In some embodiments the URB 418 may be used to send data between different threads executing on the graphics core array 414. In some embodiments the URB 418 may additionally be used for synchronization between threads on the graphics core array and fixed function logic within the shared function logic 420.

In some embodiments, graphics core array 414 is scalable, such that the array includes a variable number of graphics cores, each having a variable number of execution units based on the target power and performance level of GPE 410. In one embodiment the execution resources are dynamically scalable, such that execution resources may be enabled or disabled as needed.

The graphics core array 414 couples with shared function logic 420 that includes multiple resources that are shared between the graphics cores in the graphics core array. The shared functions within the shared function logic 420 are hardware logic units that provide specialized supplemental functionality to the graphics core array 414. In various embodiments, shared function logic 420 includes but is not limited to sampler 421, math 422, and inter-thread communication (ITC) 423 logic. Additionally, some embodiments implement one or more cache(s) 425 within the shared function logic 420.

A shared function is implemented where the demand for a given specialized function is insufficient for inclusion within the graphics core array 414. Instead a single instantiation of that specialized function is implemented as a stand-alone entity in the shared function logic 420 and shared among the execution resources within the graphics core array 414. The precise set of functions that are shared between the graphics core array 414 and included within the graphics core array 414 varies across embodiments. In some embodiments, specific shared functions within the shared function logic 420 that are used extensively by the graphics core array 414 may be included within shared function logic 416 within the graphics core array 414. In various embodiments, the shared function logic 416 within the graphics core array 414 can include some or all logic within the shared function logic 420. In one embodiment, all logic elements within the shared function logic 420 may be duplicated within the shared function logic 416 of the graphics core array 414. In one embodiment the shared function logic 420 is excluded in favor of the shared function logic 416 within the graphics core array 414.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of hardware logic of a graphics processor core 500, according to some embodiments described herein. Elements of FIG. 5 having the same reference numbers (or names) as the elements of any other figure herein can operate or function in any manner similar to that described elsewhere herein, but are not limited to such. The illustrated graphics processor core 500, in some embodiments, is included within the graphics core array 414 of FIG. 4. The graphics processor core 500, sometimes referred to as a core slice, can be one or multiple graphics cores within a modular graphics processor. The graphics processor core 500 is exemplary of one graphics core slice, and a graphics processor as described herein may include multiple graphics core slices based on target power and performance envelopes. Each graphics core 500 can include a fixed function block 530 coupled with multiple sub-cores 501A-501F, also referred to as sub-slices, that include modular blocks of general-purpose and fixed function logic.

In some embodiments the fixed function block 530 includes a geometry/fixed function pipeline 536 that can be shared by all sub-cores in the graphics processor 500, for example, in lower performance and/or lower power graphics processor implementations. In various embodiments, the geometry/fixed function pipeline 536 includes a 3D fixed function pipeline (e.g., 3D pipeline 312 as in FIG. 3 and FIG. 4) a video front-end unit, a thread spawner and thread dispatcher, and a unified return buffer manager, which manages unified return buffers, such as the unified return buffer 418 of FIG. 4.

In one embodiment the fixed function block 530 also includes a graphics SoC interface 537, a graphics microcontroller 538, and a media pipeline 539. The graphics SoC interface 537 provides an interface between the graphics core 500 and other processor cores within a system on a chip integrated circuit. The graphics microcontroller 538 is a programmable sub-processor that is configurable to manage various functions of the graphics processor 500, including thread dispatch, scheduling, and pre-emption. The media pipeline 539 (e.g., media pipeline 316 of FIG. 3 and FIG. 4) includes logic to facilitate the decoding, encoding, pre-processing, and/or post-processing of multimedia data, including image and video data. The media pipeline 539 implement media operations via requests to compute or sampling logic within the sub-cores 501-501F.

In one embodiment the SoC interface 537 enables the graphics core 500 to communicate with general-purpose application processor cores (e.g., CPUs) and/or other components within an SoC, including memory hierarchy elements such as a shared last level cache memory, the system RAM, and/or embedded on-chip or on-package DRAM. The SoC interface 537 can also enable communication with fixed function devices within the SoC, such as camera imaging pipelines, and enables the use of and/or implements global memory atomics that may be shared between the graphics core 500 and CPUs within the SoC. The SoC interface 537 can also implement power management controls for the graphics core 500 and enable an interface between a clock domain of the graphic core 500 and other clock domains within the SoC. In one embodiment the SoC interface 537 enables receipt of command buffers from a command streamer and global thread dispatcher that are configured to provide commands and instructions to each of one or more graphics cores within a graphics processor. The commands and instructions can be dispatched to the media pipeline 539, when media operations are to be performed, or a geometry and fixed function pipeline (e.g., geometry and fixed function pipeline 536, geometry and fixed function pipeline 514) when graphics processing operations are to be performed.

The graphics microcontroller 538 can be configured to perform various scheduling and management tasks for the graphics core 500. In one embodiment the graphics microcontroller 538 can perform graphics and/or compute workload scheduling on the various graphics parallel engines within execution unit (EU) arrays 502A-502F, 504A-504F within the sub-cores 501A-501F. In this scheduling model, host software executing on a CPU core of an SoC including the graphics core 500 can submit workloads one of multiple graphic processor doorbells, which invokes a scheduling operation on the appropriate graphics engine. Scheduling operations include determining which workload to run next, submitting a workload to a command streamer, pre-empting existing workloads running on an engine, monitoring progress of a workload, and notifying host software when a workload is complete. In one embodiment the graphics microcontroller 538 can also facilitate low-power or idle states for the graphics core 500, providing the graphics core 500 with the ability to save and restore registers within the graphics core 500 across low-power state transitions independently from the operating system and/or graphics driver software on the system.

The graphics core 500 may have greater than or fewer than the illustrated sub-cores 501A-501F, up to N modular sub-cores. For each set of N sub-cores, the graphics core 500 can also include shared function logic 510, shared and/or cache memory 512, a geometry/fixed function pipeline 514, as well as additional fixed function logic 516 to accelerate various graphics and compute processing operations. The shared function logic 510 can include logic units associated with the shared function logic 420 of FIG. 4 (e.g., sampler, math, and/or inter-thread communication logic) that can be shared by each N sub-cores within the graphics core 500. The shared and/or cache memory 512 can be a last-level cache for the set of N sub-cores 501A-501F within the graphics core 500, and can also serve as shared memory that is accessible by multiple sub-cores. The geometry/fixed function pipeline 514 can be included instead of the geometry/fixed function pipeline 536 within the fixed function block 530 and can include the same or similar logic units.

In one embodiment the graphics core 500 includes additional fixed function logic 516 that can include various fixed function acceleration logic for use by the graphics core 500. In one embodiment the additional fixed function logic 516 includes an additional geometry pipeline for use in position only shading. In position-only shading, two geometry pipelines exist, the full geometry pipeline within the geometry/fixed function pipeline 516, 536, and a cull pipeline, which is an additional geometry pipeline which may be included within the additional fixed function logic 516. In one embodiment the cull pipeline is a trimmed down version of the full geometry pipeline. The full pipeline and the cull pipeline can execute different instances of the same application, each instance having a separate context. Position only shading can hide long cull runs of discarded triangles, enabling shading to be completed earlier in some instances. For example, and in one embodiment the cull pipeline logic within the additional fixed function logic 516 can execute position shaders in parallel with the main application and generally generates critical results faster than the full pipeline, as the cull pipeline fetches and shades only the position attribute of the vertices, without performing rasterization and rendering of the pixels to the frame buffer. The cull pipeline can use the generated critical results to compute visibility information for all the triangles without regard to whether those triangles are culled. The full pipeline (which in this instance may be referred to as a replay pipeline) can consume the visibility information to skip the culled triangles to shade only the visible triangles that are finally passed to the rasterization phase.

In one embodiment the additional fixed function logic 516 can also include machine-learning acceleration logic, such as fixed function matrix multiplication logic, for implementations including optimizations for machine learning training or inferencing.

Within each graphics sub-core 501A-501F includes a set of execution resources that may be used to perform graphics, media, and compute operations in response to requests by graphics pipeline, media pipeline, or shader programs. The graphics sub-cores 501A-501F include multiple EU arrays 502A-502F, 504A-504F, thread dispatch and inter-thread communication (TD/IC) logic 503A-503F, a 3D (e.g., texture) sampler 505A-505F, a media sampler 506A-506F, a shader processor 507A-507F, and shared local memory (SLM) 508A-508F. The EU arrays 502A-502F, 504A-504F each include multiple execution units, which are general-purpose graphics processing units capable of performing floating-point and integer/fixed-point logic operations in service of a graphics, media, or compute operation, including graphics, media, or compute shader programs. The TD/IC logic 503A-503F performs local thread dispatch and thread control operations for the execution units within a sub-core and facilitate communication between threads executing on the execution units of the sub-core. The 3D sampler 505A-505F can read texture or other 3D graphics related data into memory. The 3D sampler can read texture data differently based on a configured sample state and the texture format associated with a given texture. The media sampler 506A-506F can perform similar read operations based on the type and format associated with media data. In one embodiment, each graphics sub-core 501A-501F can alternately include a unified 3D and media sampler. Threads executing on the execution units within each of the sub-cores 501A-501F can make use of shared local memory 508A-508F within each sub-core, to enable threads executing within a thread group to execute using a common pool of on-chip memory.

Execution Units

FIGS. 6A-6B illustrate thread execution logic 600 including an array of processing elements employed in a graphics processor core according to embodiments described herein. Elements of FIGS. 6A-6B having the same reference numbers (or names) as the elements of any other figure herein can operate or function in any manner similar to that described elsewhere herein, but are not limited to such. FIG. 6A illustrates an overview of thread execution logic 600, which can include a variant of the hardware logic illustrated with each sub-core 501A-501F of FIG. 5. FIG. 6B illustrates exemplary internal details of an execution unit.

FIGS. 6A-6B illustrate thread execution logic 600 including an array of processing elements employed in a graphics processor core according to embodiments described herein. Elements of FIGS. 6A-6B having the same reference numbers (or names) as the elements of any other figure herein can operate or function in any manner similar to that described elsewhere herein, but are not limited to such. FIG. 6A illustrates an overview of thread execution logic 600, which can include a variant of the hardware logic illustrated with each sub-core 501A-501F of FIG. 5. FIG. 6B illustrates exemplary internal details of an execution unit.

As illustrated in FIG. 6A, in some embodiments thread execution logic 600 includes a shader processor 602, a thread dispatcher 604, instruction cache 606, a scalable execution unit array including a plurality of execution units 608A-608N, a sampler 610, a data cache 612, and a data port 614. In one embodiment the scalable execution unit array can dynamically scale by enabling or disabling one or more execution units (e.g., any of execution unit 608A, 608B, 608C, 608D, through 608N-1 and 608N) based on the computational requirements of a workload. In one embodiment the included components are interconnected via an interconnect fabric that links to each of the components. In some embodiments, thread execution logic 600 includes one or more connections to memory, such as system memory or cache memory, through one or more of instruction cache 606, data port 614, sampler 610, and execution units 608A-608N. In some embodiments, each execution unit (e.g. 608A) is a stand-alone programmable general-purpose computational unit that is capable of executing multiple simultaneous hardware threads while processing multiple data elements in parallel for each thread. In various embodiments, the array of execution units 608A-608N is scalable to include any number individual execution units.

In some embodiments, the execution units 608A-608N are primarily used to execute shader programs. A shader processor 602 can process the various shader programs and dispatch execution threads associated with the shader programs via a thread dispatcher 604. In one embodiment the thread dispatcher includes logic to arbitrate thread initiation requests from the graphics and media pipelines and instantiate the requested threads on one or more execution unit in the execution units 608A-608N. For example, a geometry pipeline can dispatch vertex, tessellation, or geometry shaders to the thread execution logic for processing. In some embodiments, thread dispatcher 604 can also process runtime thread spawning requests from the executing shader programs.

In some embodiments, the execution units 608A-608N support an instruction set that includes native support for many standard 3D graphics shader instructions, such that shader programs from graphics libraries (e.g., Direct 3D and OpenGL) are executed with a minimal translation. The execution units support vertex and geometry processing (e.g., vertex programs, geometry programs, vertex shaders), pixel processing (e.g., pixel shaders, fragment shaders) and general-purpose processing (e.g., compute and media shaders). Each of the execution units 608A-608N is capable of multi-issue single instruction multiple data (SIMD) execution and multi-threaded operation enables an efficient execution environment in the face of higher latency memory accesses. Each hardware thread within each execution unit has a dedicated high-bandwidth register file and associated independent thread-state. Execution is multi-issue per clock to pipelines capable of integer, single and double precision floating point operations, SIMD branch capability, logical operations, transcendental operations, and other miscellaneous operations. While waiting for data from memory or one of the shared functions, dependency logic within the execution units 608A-608N causes a waiting thread to sleep until the requested data has been returned. While the waiting thread is sleeping, hardware resources may be devoted to processing other threads. For example, during a delay associated with a vertex shader operation, an execution unit can perform operations for a pixel shader, fragment shader, or another type of shader program, including a different vertex shader.

Each execution unit in execution units 608A-608N operates on arrays of data elements. The number of data elements is the “execution size,” or the number of channels for the instruction. An execution channel is a logical unit of execution for data element access, masking, and flow control within instructions. The number of channels may be independent of the number of physical Arithmetic Logic Units (ALUs) or Floating Point Units (FPUs) for a particular graphics processor. In some embodiments, execution units 608A-608N support integer and floating-point data types.

The execution unit instruction set includes SIMD instructions. The various data elements can be stored as a packed data type in a register and the execution unit will process the various elements based on the data size of the elements. For example, when operating on a 256-bit wide vector, the 256 bits of the vector are stored in a register and the execution unit operates on the vector as four separate 64-bit packed data elements (Quad-Word (QW) size data elements), eight separate 32-bit packed data elements (Double Word (DW) size data elements), sixteen separate 16-bit packed data elements (Word (W) size data elements), or thirty-two separate 8-bit data elements (byte (B) size data elements). However, different vector widths and register sizes are possible.

In one embodiment one or more execution units can be combined into a fused execution unit 609A-609N having thread control logic (607A-607N) that is common to the fused EUs. Multiple EUs can be fused into an EU group. Each EU in the fused EU group can be configured to execute a separate SIMD hardware thread. The number of EUs in a fused EU group can vary according to embodiments. Additionally, various SIMD widths can be performed per-EU, including but not limited to SIMD8, SIMD16, and SIMD32. Each fused graphics execution unit 609A-609N includes at least two execution units. For example, fused execution unit 609A includes a first EU 608A, second EU 608B, and thread control logic 607A that is common to the first EU 608A and the second EU 608B. The thread control logic 607A controls threads executed on the fused graphics execution unit 609A, allowing each EU within the fused execution units 609A-609N to execute using a common instruction pointer register.

One or more internal instruction caches (e.g., 606) are included in the thread execution logic 600 to cache thread instructions for the execution units. In some embodiments, one or more data caches (e.g., 612) are included to cache thread data during thread execution. In some embodiments, a sampler 610 is included to provide texture sampling for 3D operations and media sampling for media operations. In some embodiments, sampler 610 includes specialized texture or media sampling functionality to process texture or media data during the sampling process before providing the sampled data to an execution unit.

During execution, the graphics and media pipelines send thread initiation requests to thread execution logic 600 via thread spawning and dispatch logic. Once a group of geometric objects has been processed and rasterized into pixel data, pixel processor logic (e.g., pixel shader logic, fragment shader logic, etc.) within the shader processor 602 is invoked to further compute output information and cause results to be written to output surfaces (e.g., color buffers, depth buffers, stencil buffers, etc.). In some embodiments, a pixel shader or fragment shader calculates the values of the various vertex attributes that are to be interpolated across the rasterized object. In some embodiments, pixel processor logic within the shader processor 602 then executes an application programming interface (API)-supplied pixel or fragment shader program. To execute the shader program, the shader processor 602 dispatches threads to an execution unit (e.g., 608A) via thread dispatcher 604. In some embodiments, shader processor 602 uses texture sampling logic in the sampler 610 to access texture data in texture maps stored in memory. Arithmetic operations on the texture data and the input geometry data compute pixel color data for each geometric fragment, or discards one or more pixels from further processing.

In some embodiments, the data port 614 provides a memory access mechanism for the thread execution logic 600 to output processed data to memory for further processing on a graphics processor output pipeline. In some embodiments, the data port 614 includes or couples to one or more cache memories (e.g., data cache 612) to cache data for memory access via the data port.

As illustrated in FIG. 6B, a graphics execution unit 608 can include an instruction fetch unit 637, a general register file array (GRF) 624, an architectural register file array (ARF) 626, a thread arbiter 622, a send unit 630, a branch unit 632, a set of SIMD floating point units (FPUs) 634, and in one embodiment a set of dedicated integer SIMD ALUs 635. The GRF 624 and ARF 626 includes the set of general register files and architecture register files associated with each simultaneous hardware thread that may be active in the graphics execution unit 608. In one embodiment, per thread architectural state is maintained in the ARF 626, while data used during thread execution is stored in the GRF 624. The execution state of each thread, including the instruction pointers for each thread, can be held in thread-specific registers in the ARF 626.

In one embodiment the graphics execution unit 608 has an architecture that is a combination of Simultaneous Multi-Threading (SMT) and fine-grained Interleaved Multi-Threading (IMT). The architecture has a modular configuration that can be fine-tuned at design time based on a target number of simultaneous threads and number of registers per execution unit, where execution unit resources are divided across logic used to execute multiple simultaneous threads.

In one embodiment, the graphics execution unit 608 can co-issue multiple instructions, which may each be different instructions. The thread arbiter 622 of the graphics execution unit thread 608 can dispatch the instructions to one of the send unit 630, branch unit 642, or SIMD FPU(s) 634 for execution. Each execution thread can access 128 general-purpose registers within the GRF 624, where each register can store 32 bytes, accessible as a SIMD 8-element vector of 32-bit data elements. In one embodiment, each execution unit thread has access to 4 Kbytes within the GRF 624, although embodiments are not so limited, and greater or fewer register resources may be provided in other embodiments. In one embodiment up to seven threads can execute simultaneously, although the number of threads per execution unit can also vary according to embodiments. In an embodiment in which seven threads may access 4 Kbytes, the GRF 624 can store a total of 28 Kbytes. Flexible addressing modes can permit registers to be addressed together to build effectively wider registers or to represent strided rectangular block data structures.

In one embodiment, memory operations, sampler operations, and other longer-latency system communications are dispatched via “send” instructions that are executed by the message passing send unit 630. In one embodiment, branch instructions are dispatched to a dedicated branch unit 632 to facilitate SIMD divergence and eventual convergence.

In one embodiment the graphics execution unit 608 includes one or more SIMD floating point units (FPU(s)) 634 to perform floating-point operations. In one embodiment, the FPU(s) 634 also support integer computation. In one embodiment the FPU(s) 634 can SIMD execute up to M number of 32-bit floating-point (or integer) operations, or SIMD execute up to 2M 16-bit integer or 16-bit floating-point operations. In one embodiment, at least one of the FPU(s) provides extended math capability to support high-throughput transcendental math functions and double precision 64-bit floating-point. In some embodiments, a set of 8-bit integer SIMD ALUs 635 are also present, and may be specifically optimized to perform operations associated with machine learning computations.

In one embodiment, arrays of multiple instances of the graphics execution unit 608 can be instantiated in a graphics sub-core grouping (e.g., a sub-slice). For scalability, product architects can choose the exact number of execution units per sub-core grouping. In one embodiment the execution unit 608 can execute instructions across a plurality of execution channels. In a further embodiment, each thread executed on the graphics execution unit 608 is executed on a different channel.

FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating a graphics processor instruction formats 700 according to some embodiments. In one or more embodiment, the graphics processor execution units support an instruction set having instructions in multiple formats. The solid lined boxes illustrate the components that are generally included in an execution unit instruction, while the dashed lines include components that are optional or that are only included in a sub-set of the instructions. In some embodiments, instruction format 700 described and illustrated are macro-instructions, in that they are instructions supplied to the execution unit, as opposed to micro-operations resulting from instruction decode once the instruction is processed.

In some embodiments, the graphics processor execution units natively support instructions in a 128-bit instruction format 710. A 64-bit compacted instruction format 730 is available for some instructions based on the selected instruction, instruction options, and number of operands. The native 128-bit instruction format 710 provides access to all instruction options, while some options and operations are restricted in the 64-bit format 730. The native instructions available in the 64-bit format 730 vary by embodiment. In some embodiments, the instruction is compacted in part using a set of index values in an index field 713. The execution unit hardware references a set of compaction tables based on the index values and uses the compaction table outputs to reconstruct a native instruction in the 128-bit instruction format 710.

For each format, instruction opcode 712 defines the operation that the execution unit is to perform. The execution units execute each instruction in parallel across the multiple data elements of each operand. For example, in response to an add instruction the execution unit performs a simultaneous add operation across each color channel representing a texture element or picture element. By default, the execution unit performs each instruction across all data channels of the operands. In some embodiments, instruction control field 714 enables control over certain execution options, such as channels selection (e.g., predication) and data channel order (e.g., swizzle). For instructions in the 128-bit instruction format 710 an exec-size field 716 limits the number of data channels that will be executed in parallel. In some embodiments, exec-size field 716 is not available for use in the 64-bit compact instruction format 730.

Some execution unit instructions have up to three operands including two source operands, src0 720, src1 722, and one destination 718. In some embodiments, the execution units support dual destination instructions, where one of the destinations is implied. Data manipulation instructions can have a third source operand (e.g., SRC2 724), where the instruction opcode 712 determines the number of source operands. An instruction's last source operand can be an immediate (e.g., hard-coded) value passed with the instruction.

In some embodiments, the 128-bit instruction format 710 includes an access/address mode field 726 specifying, for example, whether direct register addressing mode or indirect register addressing mode is used. When direct register addressing mode is used, the register address of one or more operands is directly provided by bits in the instruction.

In some embodiments, the 128-bit instruction format 710 includes an access/address mode field 726, which specifies an address mode and/or an access mode for the instruction. In one embodiment the access mode is used to define a data access alignment for the instruction. Some embodiments support access modes including a 16-byte aligned access mode and a 1-byte aligned access mode, where the byte alignment of the access mode determines the access alignment of the instruction operands. For example, when in a first mode, the instruction may use byte-aligned addressing for source and destination operands and when in a second mode, the instruction may use 16-byte-aligned addressing for all source and destination operands.

In one embodiment, the address mode portion of the access/address mode field 726 determines whether the instruction is to use direct or indirect addressing. When direct register addressing mode is used bits in the instruction directly provide the register address of one or more operands. When indirect register addressing mode is used, the register address of one or more operands may be computed based on an address register value and an address immediate field in the instruction.

In some embodiments instructions are grouped based on opcode 712 bit-fields to simplify Opcode decode 740. For an 8-bit opcode, bits 4, 5, and 6 allow the execution unit to determine the type of opcode. The precise opcode grouping shown is merely an example. In some embodiments, a move and logic opcode group 742 includes data movement and logic instructions (e.g., move (mov), compare (cmp)). In some embodiments, move and logic group 742 shares the five most significant bits (MSB), where move (mov) instructions are in the form of 0000xxxxb and logic instructions are in the form of 0001xxxxb. A flow control instruction group 744 (e.g., call, jump (jmp)) includes instructions in the form of 0010xxxxb (e.g., 0x20). A miscellaneous instruction group 746 includes a mix of instructions, including synchronization instructions (e.g., wait, send) in the form of 0011xxxxb (e.g., 0x30). A parallel math instruction group 748 includes component-wise arithmetic instructions (e.g., add, multiply (mul)) in the form of 0100xxxxb (e.g., 0x40). The parallel math group 748 performs the arithmetic operations in parallel across data channels. The vector math group 750 includes arithmetic instructions (e.g., dp4) in the form of 0101xxxxb (e.g., 0x50). The vector math group performs arithmetic such as dot product calculations on vector operands.

Graphics Pipeline

FIG. 8 is a block diagram of another embodiment of a graphics processor 800. Elements of FIG. 8 having the same reference numbers (or names) as the elements of any other figure herein can operate or function in any manner similar to that described elsewhere herein, but are not limited to such.

In some embodiments, graphics processor 800 includes a geometry pipeline 820, a media pipeline 830, a display engine 840, thread execution logic 850, and a render output pipeline 870. In some embodiments, graphics processor 800 is a graphics processor within a multi-core processing system that includes one or more general-purpose processing cores. The graphics processor is controlled by register writes to one or more control registers (not shown) or via commands issued to graphics processor 800 via a ring interconnect 802. In some embodiments, ring interconnect 802 couples graphics processor 800 to other processing components, such as other graphics processors or general-purpose processors. Commands from ring interconnect 802 are interpreted by a command streamer 803, which supplies instructions to individual components of the geometry pipeline 820 or the media pipeline 830.

In some embodiments, command streamer 803 directs the operation of a vertex fetcher 805 that reads vertex data from memory and executes vertex-processing commands provided by command streamer 803. In some embodiments, vertex fetcher 805 provides vertex data to a vertex shader 807, which performs coordinate space transformation and lighting operations to each vertex. In some embodiments, vertex fetcher 805 and vertex shader 807 execute vertex-processing instructions by dispatching execution threads to execution units 852A-852B via a thread dispatcher 831.

In some embodiments, execution units 852A-852B are an array of vector processors having an instruction set for performing graphics and media operations. In some embodiments, execution units 852A-852B have an attached L1 cache 851 that is specific for each array or shared between the arrays. The cache can be configured as a data cache, an instruction cache, or a single cache that is partitioned to contain data and instructions in different partitions.

In some embodiments, geometry pipeline 820 includes tessellation components to perform hardware-accelerated tessellation of 3D objects. In some embodiments, a programmable hull shader 811 configures the tessellation operations. A programmable domain shader 817 provides back-end evaluation of tessellation output. A tessellator 813 operates at the direction of hull shader 811 and contains special purpose logic to generate a set of detailed geometric objects based on a coarse geometric model that is provided as input to geometry pipeline 820. In some embodiments, if tessellation is not used, tessellation components (e.g., hull shader 811, tessellator 813, and domain shader 817) can be bypassed.

In some embodiments, complete geometric objects can be processed by a geometry shader 819 via one or more threads dispatched to execution units 852A-852B, or can proceed directly to the clipper 829. In some embodiments, the geometry shader operates on entire geometric objects, rather than vertices or patches of vertices as in previous stages of the graphics pipeline. If the tessellation is disabled, the geometry shader 819 receives input from the vertex shader 807. In some embodiments, geometry shader 819 is programmable by a geometry shader program to perform geometry tessellation if the tessellation units are disabled.

Before rasterization, a clipper 829 processes vertex data. The clipper 829 may be a fixed function clipper or a programmable clipper having clipping and geometry shader functions. In some embodiments, a rasterizer and depth test component 873 in the render output pipeline 870 dispatches pixel shaders to convert the geometric objects into per pixel representations. In some embodiments, pixel shader logic is included in thread execution logic 850. In some embodiments, an application can bypass the rasterizer and depth test component 873 and access un-rasterized vertex data via a stream out unit 823.

The graphics processor 800 has an interconnect bus, interconnect fabric, or some other interconnect mechanism that allows data and message passing amongst the major components of the processor. In some embodiments, execution units 852A-852B and associated logic units (e.g., L1 cache 851, sampler 854, texture cache 858, etc.) interconnect via a data port 856 to perform memory access and communicate with render output pipeline components of the processor. In some embodiments, sampler 854, caches 851, 858 and execution units 852A-852B each have separate memory access paths. In one embodiment the texture cache 858 can also be configured as a sampler cache.

In some embodiments, render output pipeline 870 contains a rasterizer and depth test component 873 that converts vertex-based objects into an associated pixel-based representation. In some embodiments, the rasterizer logic includes a windower/masker unit to perform fixed function triangle and line rasterization. An associated render cache 878 and depth cache 879 are also available in some embodiments. A pixel operations component 877 performs pixel-based operations on the data, though in some instances, pixel operations associated with 2D operations (e.g. bit block image transfers with blending) are performed by the 2D engine 841, or substituted at display time by the display controller 843 using overlay display planes. In some embodiments, a shared L3 cache 875 is available to all graphics components, allowing the sharing of data without the use of main system memory.

In some embodiments, graphics processor media pipeline 830 includes a media engine 837 and a video front-end 834. In some embodiments, video front-end 834 receives pipeline commands from the command streamer 803. In some embodiments, media pipeline 830 includes a separate command streamer. In some embodiments, video front-end 834 processes media commands before sending the command to the media engine 837. In some embodiments, media engine 837 includes thread spawning functionality to spawn threads for dispatch to thread execution logic 850 via thread dispatcher 831.

In some embodiments, graphics processor 800 includes a display engine 840. In some embodiments, display engine 840 is external to processor 800 and couples with the graphics processor via the ring interconnect 802, or some other interconnect bus or fabric. In some embodiments, display engine 840 includes a 2D engine 841 and a display controller 843. In some embodiments, display engine 840 contains special purpose logic capable of operating independently of the 3D pipeline. In some embodiments, display controller 843 couples with a display device (not shown), which may be a system integrated display device, as in a laptop computer, or an external display device attached via a display device connector.

In some embodiments, the geometry pipeline 820 and media pipeline 830 are configurable to perform operations based on multiple graphics and media programming interfaces and are not specific to any one application programming interface (API). In some embodiments, driver software for the graphics processor translates API calls that are specific to a particular graphics or media library into commands that can be processed by the graphics processor. In some embodiments, support is provided for the Open Graphics Library (OpenGL), Open Computing Language (OpenCL), and/or Vulkan graphics and compute API, all from the Khronos Group. In some embodiments, support may also be provided for the Direct3D library from the Microsoft Corporation. In some embodiments, a combination of these libraries may be supported. Support may also be provided for the Open Source Computer Vision Library (OpenCV). A future API with a compatible 3D pipeline would also be supported if a mapping can be made from the pipeline of the future API to the pipeline of the graphics processor.

Graphics Pipeline Programming

FIG. 9A is a block diagram illustrating a graphics processor command format 900 according to some embodiments. FIG. 9B is a block diagram illustrating a graphics processor command sequence 910 according to an embodiment. The solid lined boxes in FIG. 9A illustrate the components that are generally included in a graphics command while the dashed lines include components that are optional or that are only included in a sub-set of the graphics commands. The exemplary graphics processor command format 900 of FIG. 9A includes data fields to identify a client 902, a command operation code (opcode) 904, and data 906 for the command. A sub-opcode 905 and a command size 908 are also included in some commands.

In some embodiments, client 902 specifies the client unit of the graphics device that processes the command data. In some embodiments, a graphics processor command parser examines the client field of each command to condition the further processing of the command and route the command data to the appropriate client unit. In some embodiments, the graphics processor client units include a memory interface unit, a render unit, a 2D unit, a 3D unit, and a media unit. Each client unit has a corresponding processing pipeline that processes the commands. Once the command is received by the client unit, the client unit reads the opcode 904 and, if present, sub-opcode 905 to determine the operation to perform. The client unit performs the command using information in data field 906. For some commands an explicit command size 908 is expected to specify the size of the command. In some embodiments, the command parser automatically determines the size of at least some of the commands based on the command opcode. In some embodiments commands are aligned via multiples of a double word.

The flow diagram in FIG. 9B illustrates an exemplary graphics processor command sequence 910. In some embodiments, software or firmware of a data processing system that features an embodiment of a graphics processor uses a version of the command sequence shown to set up, execute, and terminate a set of graphics operations. A sample command sequence is shown and described for purposes of example only as embodiments are not limited to these specific commands or to this command sequence. Moreover, the commands may be issued as batch of commands in a command sequence, such that the graphics processor will process the sequence of commands in at least partially concurrence.

In some embodiments, the graphics processor command sequence 910 may begin with a pipeline flush command 912 to cause any active graphics pipeline to complete the currently pending commands for the pipeline. In some embodiments, the 3D pipeline 922 and the media pipeline 924 do not operate concurrently. The pipeline flush is performed to cause the active graphics pipeline to complete any pending commands. In response to a pipeline flush, the command parser for the graphics processor will pause command processing until the active drawing engines complete pending operations and the relevant read caches are invalidated. Optionally, any data in the render cache that is marked ‘dirty’ can be flushed to memory. In some embodiments, pipeline flush command 912 can be used for pipeline synchronization or before placing the graphics processor into a low power state.

In some embodiments, a pipeline select command 913 is used when a command sequence requires the graphics processor to explicitly switch between pipelines. In some embodiments, a pipeline select command 913 is required only once within an execution context before issuing pipeline commands unless the context is to issue commands for both pipelines. In some embodiments, a pipeline flush command 912 is required immediately before a pipeline switch via the pipeline select command 913.

In some embodiments, a pipeline control command 914 configures a graphics pipeline for operation and is used to program the 3D pipeline 922 and the media pipeline 924. In some embodiments, pipeline control command 914 configures the pipeline state for the active pipeline. In one embodiment, the pipeline control command 914 is used for pipeline synchronization and to clear data from one or more cache memories within the active pipeline before processing a batch of commands.

In some embodiments, return buffer state commands 916 are used to configure a set of return buffers for the respective pipelines to write data. Some pipeline operations require the allocation, selection, or configuration of one or more return buffers into which the operations write intermediate data during processing. In some embodiments, the graphics processor also uses one or more return buffers to store output data and to perform cross thread communication. In some embodiments, the return buffer state 916 includes selecting the size and number of return buffers to use for a set of pipeline operations.

The remaining commands in the command sequence differ based on the active pipeline for operations. Based on a pipeline determination 920, the command sequence is tailored to the 3D pipeline 922 beginning with the 3D pipeline state 930 or the media pipeline 924 beginning at the media pipeline state 940.

The commands to configure the 3D pipeline state 930 include 3D state setting commands for vertex buffer state, vertex element state, constant color state, depth buffer state, and other state variables that are to be configured before 3D primitive commands are processed. The values of these commands are determined at least in part based on the particular 3D API in use. In some embodiments, 3D pipeline state 930 commands are also able to selectively disable or bypass certain pipeline elements if those elements will not be used.

In some embodiments, 3D primitive 932 command is used to submit 3D primitives to be processed by the 3D pipeline. Commands and associated parameters that are passed to the graphics processor via the 3D primitive 932 command are forwarded to the vertex fetch function in the graphics pipeline. The vertex fetch function uses the 3D primitive 932 command data to generate vertex data structures. The vertex data structures are stored in one or more return buffers. In some embodiments, 3D primitive 932 command is used to perform vertex operations on 3D primitives via vertex shaders. To process vertex shaders, 3D pipeline 922 dispatches shader execution threads to graphics processor execution units.

In some embodiments, 3D pipeline 922 is triggered via an execute 934 command or event. In some embodiments, a register write triggers command execution. In some embodiments execution is triggered via a ‘go’ or ‘kick’ command in the command sequence. In one embodiment, command execution is triggered using a pipeline synchronization command to flush the command sequence through the graphics pipeline. The 3D pipeline will perform geometry processing for the 3D primitives. Once operations are complete, the resulting geometric objects are rasterized and the pixel engine colors the resulting pixels. Additional commands to control pixel shading and pixel back end operations may also be included for those operations.

In some embodiments, the graphics processor command sequence 910 follows the media pipeline 924 path when performing media operations. In general, the specific use and manner of programming for the media pipeline 924 depends on the media or compute operations to be performed. Specific media decode operations may be offloaded to the media pipeline during media decode. In some embodiments, the media pipeline can also be bypassed and media decode can be performed in whole or in part using resources provided by one or more general-purpose processing cores. In one embodiment, the media pipeline also includes elements for general-purpose graphics processor unit (GPGPU) operations, where the graphics processor is used to perform SIMD vector operations using computational shader programs that are not explicitly related to the rendering of graphics primitives.

In some embodiments, media pipeline 924 is configured in a similar manner as the 3D pipeline 922. A set of commands to configure the media pipeline state 940 are dispatched or placed into a command queue before the media object commands 942. In some embodiments, commands for the media pipeline state 940 include data to configure the media pipeline elements that will be used to process the media objects. This includes data to configure the video decode and video encode logic within the media pipeline, such as encode or decode format. In some embodiments, commands for the media pipeline state 940 also support the use of one or more pointers to “indirect” state elements that contain a batch of state settings.

In some embodiments, media object commands 942 supply pointers to media objects for processing by the media pipeline. The media objects include memory buffers containing video data to be processed. In some embodiments, all media pipeline states must be valid before issuing a media object command 942. Once the pipeline state is configured and media object commands 942 are queued, the media pipeline 924 is triggered via an execute command 944 or an equivalent execute event (e.g., register write). Output from media pipeline 924 may then be post processed by operations provided by the 3D pipeline 922 or the media pipeline 924. In some embodiments, GPGPU operations are configured and executed in a similar manner as media operations.

Graphics Software Architecture

FIG. 10 illustrates exemplary graphics software architecture for a data processing system 1000 according to some embodiments. In some embodiments, software architecture includes a 3D graphics application 1010, an operating system 1020, and at least one processor 1030. In some embodiments, processor 1030 includes a graphics processor 1032 and one or more general-purpose processor core(s) 1034. The graphics application 1010 and operating system 1020 each execute in the system memory 1050 of the data processing system.

In some embodiments, 3D graphics application 1010 contains one or more shader programs including shader instructions 1012. The shader language instructions may be in a high-level shader language, such as the High Level Shader Language (HLSL) or the OpenGL Shader Language (GLSL). The application also includes executable instructions 1014 in a machine language suitable for execution by the general-purpose processor core 1034. The application also includes graphics objects 1016 defined by vertex data.

In some embodiments, operating system 1020 is a Microsoft® Windows® operating system from the Microsoft Corporation, a proprietary UNIX-like operating system, or an open source UNIX-like operating system using a variant of the Linux kernel. The operating system 1020 can support a graphics API 1022 such as the Direct3D API, the OpenGL API, or the Vulkan API. When the Direct3D API is in use, the operating system 1020 uses a front-end shader compiler 1024 to compile any shader instructions 1012 in HLSL into a lower-level shader language. The compilation may be a just-in-time (JIT) compilation or the application can perform shader pre-compilation. In some embodiments, high-level shaders are compiled into low-level shaders during the compilation of the 3D graphics application 1010. In some embodiments, the shader instructions 1012 are provided in an intermediate form, such as a version of the Standard Portable Intermediate Representation (SPIR) used by the Vulkan API.

In some embodiments, user mode graphics driver 1026 contains a back-end shader compiler 1027 to convert the shader instructions 1012 into a hardware specific representation. When the OpenGL API is in use, shader instructions 1012 in the GLSL high-level language are passed to a user mode graphics driver 1026 for compilation. In some embodiments, user mode graphics driver 1026 uses operating system kernel mode functions 1028 to communicate with a kernel mode graphics driver 1029. In some embodiments, kernel mode graphics driver 1029 communicates with graphics processor 1032 to dispatch commands and instructions.

IP Core Implementations

One or more aspects of at least one embodiment may be implemented by representative code stored on a machine-readable medium which represents and/or defines logic within an integrated circuit such as a processor. For example, the machine-readable medium may include instructions which represent various logic within the processor. When read by a machine, the instructions may cause the machine to fabricate the logic to perform the techniques described herein. Such representations, known as “IP cores,” are reusable units of logic for an integrated circuit that may be stored on a tangible, machine-readable medium as a hardware model that describes the structure of the integrated circuit. The hardware model may be supplied to various customers or manufacturing facilities, which load the hardware model on fabrication machines that manufacture the integrated circuit. The integrated circuit may be fabricated such that the circuit performs operations described in association with any of the embodiments described herein.

FIG. 11A is a block diagram illustrating an IP core development system 1100 that may be used to manufacture an integrated circuit to perform operations according to an embodiment. The IP core development system 1100 may be used to generate modular, re-usable designs that can be incorporated into a larger design or used to construct an entire integrated circuit (e.g., an SOC integrated circuit). A design facility 1130 can generate a software simulation 1110 of an IP core design in a high-level programming language (e.g., C/C++). The software simulation 1110 can be used to design, test, and verify the behavior of the IP core using a simulation model 1112. The simulation model 1112 may include functional, behavioral, and/or timing simulations. A register transfer level (RTL) design 1115 can then be created or synthesized from the simulation model 1112. The RTL design 1115 is an abstraction of the behavior of the integrated circuit that models the flow of digital signals between hardware registers, including the associated logic performed using the modeled digital signals. In addition to an RTL design 1115, lower-level designs at the logic level or transistor level may also be created, designed, or synthesized. Thus, the particular details of the initial design and simulation may vary.

The RTL design 1115 or equivalent may be further synthesized by the design facility into a hardware model 1120, which may be in a hardware description language (HDL), or some other representation of physical design data. The HDL may be further simulated or tested to verify the IP core design. The IP core design can be stored for delivery to a 3^(rd) party fabrication facility 1165 using non-volatile memory 1140 (e.g., hard disk, flash memory, or any non-volatile storage medium). Alternatively, the IP core design may be transmitted (e.g., via the Internet) over a wired connection 1150 or wireless connection 1160. The fabrication facility 1165 may then fabricate an integrated circuit that is based at least in part on the IP core design. The fabricated integrated circuit can be configured to perform operations in accordance with at least one embodiment described herein.

FIG. 11B illustrates a cross-section side view of an integrated circuit package assembly 1170, according to some embodiments described herein. The integrated circuit package assembly 1170 illustrates an implementation of one or more processor or accelerator devices as described herein. The package assembly 1170 includes multiple units of hardware logic 1172, 1174 connected to a substrate 1180. The logic 1172, 1174 may be implemented at least partly in configurable logic or fixed-functionality logic hardware, and can include one or more portions of any of the processor core(s), graphics processor(s), or other accelerator devices described herein. Each unit of logic 1172, 1174 can be implemented within a semiconductor die and coupled with the substrate 1180 via an interconnect structure 1173. The interconnect structure 1173 may be configured to route electrical signals between the logic 1172, 1174 and the substrate 1180, and can include interconnects such as, but not limited to bumps or pillars. In some embodiments, the interconnect structure 1173 may be configured to route electrical signals such as, for example, input/output (I/O) signals and/or power or ground signals associated with the operation of the logic 1172, 1174. In some embodiments, the substrate 1180 is an epoxy-based laminate substrate. The package substrate 1180 may include other suitable types of substrates in other embodiments. The package assembly 1170 can be connected to other electrical devices via a package interconnect 1183. The package interconnect 1183 may be coupled to a surface of the substrate 1180 to route electrical signals to other electrical devices, such as a motherboard, other chipset, or multi-chip module.

In some embodiments, the units of logic 1172, 1174 are electrically coupled with a bridge 1182 that is configured to route electrical signals between the logic 1172, 1174. The bridge 1182 may be a dense interconnect structure that provides a route for electrical signals. The bridge 1182 may include a bridge substrate composed of glass or a suitable semiconductor material. Electrical routing features can be formed on the bridge substrate to provide a chip-to-chip connection between the logic 1172, 1174.

Although two units of logic 1172, 1174 and a bridge 1182 are illustrated, embodiments described herein may include more or fewer logic units on one or more dies. The one or more dies may be connected by zero or more bridges, as the bridge 1182 may be excluded when the logic is included on a single die. Alternatively, multiple dies or units of logic can be connected by one or more bridges. Additionally, multiple logic units, dies, and bridges can be connected together in other possible configurations, including three-dimensional configurations.

Exemplary System on a Chip Integrated Circuit

FIGS. 12-14 illustrated exemplary integrated circuits and associated graphics processors that may be fabricated using one or more IP cores, according to various embodiments described herein. In addition to what is illustrated, other logic and circuits may be included, including additional graphics processors/cores, peripheral interface controllers, or general-purpose processor cores.

FIG. 12 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary system on a chip integrated circuit 1200 that may be fabricated using one or more IP cores, according to an embodiment. Exemplary integrated circuit 1200 includes one or more application processor(s) 1205 (e.g., CPUs), at least one graphics processor 1210, and may additionally include an image processor 1215 and/or a video processor 1220, any of which may be a modular IP core from the same or multiple different design facilities. Integrated circuit 1200 includes peripheral or bus logic including a USB controller 1225, UART controller 1230, an SPI/SDIO controller 1235, and an I²S/I²C controller 1240. Additionally, the integrated circuit can include a display device 1245 coupled to one or more of a high-definition multimedia interface (HDMI) controller 1250 and a mobile industry processor interface (MIPI) display interface 1255. Storage may be provided by a flash memory subsystem 1260 including flash memory and a flash memory controller. Memory interface may be provided via a memory controller 1265 for access to SDRAM or SRAM memory devices. Some integrated circuits additionally include an embedded security engine 1270.

FIGS. 13A-13B are block diagrams illustrating exemplary graphics processors for use within an SoC, according to embodiments described herein. FIG. 13A illustrates an exemplary graphics processor 1310 of a system on a chip integrated circuit that may be fabricated using one or more IP cores, according to an embodiment. FIG. 13B illustrates an additional exemplary graphics processor 1340 of a system on a chip integrated circuit that may be fabricated using one or more IP cores, according to an embodiment. Graphics processor 1310 of FIG. 13A is an example of a low power graphics processor core. Graphics processor 1340 of FIG. 13B is an example of a higher performance graphics processor core. Each of the graphics processors 1310, 1340 can be variants of the graphics processor 1210 of FIG. 12.

As shown in FIG. 13A, graphics processor 1310 includes a vertex processor 1305 and one or more fragment processor(s) 1315A-1315N (e.g., 1315A, 1315B, 1315C, 1315D, through 1315N-1, and 1315N). Graphics processor 1310 can execute different shader programs via separate logic, such that the vertex processor 1305 is optimized to execute operations for vertex shader programs, while the one or more fragment processor(s) 1315A-1315N execute fragment (e.g., pixel) shading operations for fragment or pixel shader programs. The vertex processor 1305 performs the vertex processing stage of the 3D graphics pipeline and generates primitives and vertex data. The fragment processor(s) 1315A-1315N use the primitive and vertex data generated by the vertex processor 1305 to produce a framebuffer that is displayed on a display device. In one embodiment, the fragment processor(s) 1315A-1315N are optimized to execute fragment shader programs as provided for in the OpenGL API, which may be used to perform similar operations as a pixel shader program as provided for in the Direct 3D API.

Graphics processor 1310 additionally includes one or more memory management units (MMUs) 1320A-1320B, cache(s) 1325A-1325B, and circuit interconnect(s) 1330A-1330B. The one or more MMU(s) 1320A-1320B provide for virtual to physical address mapping for the graphics processor 1310, including for the vertex processor 1305 and/or fragment processor(s) 1315A-1315N, which may reference vertex or image/texture data stored in memory, in addition to vertex or image/texture data stored in the one or more cache(s) 1325A-1325B. In one embodiment the one or more MMU(s) 1320A-1320B may be synchronized with other MMUs within the system, including one or more MMUs associated with the one or more application processor(s) 1205, image processor 1215, and/or video processor 1220 of FIG. 12, such that each processor 1205-1220 can participate in a shared or unified virtual memory system. The one or more circuit interconnect(s) 1330A-1330B enable graphics processor 1310 to interface with other IP cores within the SoC, either via an internal bus of the SoC or via a direct connection, according to embodiments.

As shown FIG. 13B, graphics processor 1340 includes the one or more MMU(s) 1320A-1320B, caches 1325A-1325B, and circuit interconnects 1330A-1330B of the graphics processor 1310 of FIG. 13A. Graphics processor 1340 includes one or more shader core(s) 1355A-1355N (e.g., 1455A, 1355B, 1355C, 1355D, 1355E, 1355F, through 1355N-1, and 1355N), which provides for a unified shader core architecture in which a single core or type or core can execute all types of programmable shader code, including shader program code to implement vertex shaders, fragment shaders, and/or compute shaders. The exact number of shader cores present can vary among embodiments and implementations. Additionally, graphics processor 1340 includes an inter-core task manager 1345, which acts as a thread dispatcher to dispatch execution threads to one or more shader cores 1355A-1355N and a tiling unit 1358 to accelerate tiling operations for tile-based rendering, in which rendering operations for a scene are subdivided in image space, for example to exploit local spatial coherence within a scene or to optimize use of internal caches.

FIGS. 14A-14B illustrate additional exemplary graphics processor logic according to embodiments described herein. FIG. 14A illustrates a graphics core 1400 that may be included within the graphics processor 1210 of FIG. 12, and may be a unified shader core 1355A-1355N as in FIG. 13B. FIG. 14B illustrates a highly-parallel general-purpose graphics processing unit 1430 suitable for deployment on a multi-chip module.

As shown in FIG. 14A, the graphics core 1400 includes a shared instruction cache 1402, a texture unit 1418, and a cache/shared memory 1420 that are common to the execution resources within the graphics core 1400. The graphics core 1400 can include multiple slices 1401A-1401N or partition for each core, and a graphics processor can include multiple instances of the graphics core 1400. The slices 1401A-1401N can include support logic including a local instruction cache 1404A-1404N, a thread scheduler 1406A-1406N, a thread dispatcher 1408A-1408N, and a set of registers 1410A. To perform logic operations, the slices 1401A-1401N can include a set of additional function units (AFUs 1412A-1412N), floating-point units (FPU 1414A-1414N), integer arithmetic logic units (ALUs 1416-1416N), address computational units (ACU 1413A-1413N), double-precision floating-point units (DPFPU 1415A-1415N), and matrix processing units (MPU 1417A-1417N).

Some of the computational units operate at a specific precision. For example, the FPUs 1414A-1414N can perform single-precision (32-bit) and half-precision (16-bit) floating point operations, while the DPFPUs 1415A-1415N perform double precision (64-bit) floating point operations. The ALUs 1416A-1416N can perform variable precision integer operations at 8-bit, 16-bit, and 32-bit precision, and can be configured for mixed precision operations. The MPUs 1417A-1417N can also be configured for mixed precision matrix operations, including half-precision floating point and 8-bit integer operations. The MPUs 1417-1417N can perform a variety of matrix operations to accelerate machine learning application frameworks, including enabling support for accelerated general matrix to matrix multiplication (GEMM). The AFUs 1412A-1412N can perform additional logic operations not supported by the floating-point or integer units, including trigonometric operations (e.g., Sine, Cosine, etc.).

As shown in FIG. 14B, a general-purpose processing unit (GPGPU) 1430 can be configured to enable highly-parallel compute operations to be performed by an array of graphics processing units. Additionally, the GPGPU 1430 can be linked directly to other instances of the GPGPU to create a multi-GPU cluster to improve training speed for particularly deep neural networks. The GPGPU 1430 includes a host interface 1432 to enable a connection with a host processor. In one embodiment the host interface 1432 is a PCI Express interface. However, the host interface can also be a vendor specific communications interface or communications fabric. The GPGPU 1430 receives commands from the host processor and uses a global scheduler 1434 to distribute execution threads associated with those commands to a set of compute clusters 1436A-1436H. The compute clusters 1436A-1436H share a cache memory 1438. The cache memory 1438 can serve as a higher-level cache for cache memories within the compute clusters 1436A-1436H.

The GPGPU 1430 includes memory 1434A-1434B coupled with the compute clusters 1436A-1436H via a set of memory controllers 1442A-1442B. In various embodiments, the memory 1434A-1434B can include various types of memory devices including dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) or graphics random access memory, such as synchronous graphics random access memory (SGRAM), including graphics double data rate (GDDR) memory.

In one embodiment the compute clusters 1436A-1436H each include a set of graphics cores, such as the graphics core 1400 of FIG. 14A, which can include multiple types of integer and floating point logic units that can perform computational operations at a range of precisions including suited for machine learning computations. For example, and in one embodiment at least a subset of the floating point units in each of the compute clusters 1436A-1436H can be configured to perform 16-bit or 32-bit floating point operations, while a different subset of the floating point units can be configured to perform 64-bit floating point operations.

Multiple instances of the GPGPU 1430 can be configured to operate as a compute cluster. The communication mechanism used by the compute cluster for synchronization and data exchange varies across embodiments. In one embodiment the multiple instances of the GPGPU 1430 communicate over the host interface 1432. In one embodiment the GPGPU 1430 includes an I/O hub 1439 that couples the GPGPU 1430 with a GPU link 1440 that enables a direct connection to other instances of the GPGPU. In one embodiment the GPU link 1440 is coupled to a dedicated GPU-to-GPU bridge that enables communication and synchronization between multiple instances of the GPGPU 1430. In one embodiment the GPU link 1440 couples with a high speed interconnect to transmit and receive data to other GPGPUs or parallel processors. In one embodiment the multiple instances of the GPGPU 1430 are located in separate data processing systems and communicate via a network device that is accessible via the host interface 1432. In one embodiment the GPU link 1440 can be configured to enable a connection to a host processor in addition to or as an alternative to the host interface 1432.

While the illustrated configuration of the GPGPU 1430 can be configured to train neural networks, one embodiment provides alternate configuration of the GPGPU 1430 that can be configured for deployment within a high performance or low power inferencing platform. In an inferencing configuration the GPGPU 1430 includes fewer of the compute clusters 1436A-1436H relative to the training configuration. Additionally, the memory technology associated with the memory 1434A-1434B may differ between inferencing and training configurations, with higher bandwidth memory technologies devoted to training configurations. In one embodiment the inferencing configuration of the GPGPU 1430 can support inferencing specific instructions. For example, an inferencing configuration can provide support for one or more 8-bit integer dot product instructions, which are commonly used during inferencing operations for deployed neural networks.

FIG. 15 is a generalized diagram of a machine learning software stack 1500. A machine learning application 1502 can be configured to train a neural network using a training dataset or to use a trained deep neural network to implement machine intelligence. The machine learning application 1502 can include training and inference functionality for a neural network and/or specialized software that can be used to train a neural network before deployment. The machine learning application 1502 can implement any type of machine intelligence including but not limited to image recognition, mapping and localization, autonomous navigation, speech synthesis, medical imaging, or language translation.

Hardware acceleration for the machine learning application 1502 can be enabled via a machine learning framework 1504. The machine learning framework 1504 can provide a library of machine learning primitives. Machine learning primitives are basic operations that are commonly performed by machine learning algorithms. Without the machine learning framework 1504, developers of machine learning algorithms would be required to create and optimize the main computational logic associated with the machine learning algorithm, then re-optimize the computational logic as new parallel processors are developed. Instead, the machine learning application can be configured to perform the necessary computations using the primitives provided by the machine learning framework 1504. Exemplary primitives include tensor convolutions, activation functions, and pooling, which are computational operations that are performed while training a convolutional neural network (CNN). The machine learning framework 1504 can also provide primitives to implement basic linear algebra subprograms performed by many machine-learning algorithms, such as matrix and vector operations.

The machine learning framework 1504 can process input data received from the machine learning application 1502 and generate the appropriate input to a compute framework 1506. The compute framework 1506 can abstract the underlying instructions provided to the GPGPU driver 1508 to enable the machine learning framework 1504 to take advantage of hardware acceleration via the GPGPU hardware 1510 without requiring the machine learning framework 1504 to have intimate knowledge of the architecture of the GPGPU hardware 1510. Additionally, the compute framework 1506 can enable hardware acceleration for the machine learning framework 1504 across a variety of types and generations of the GPGPU hardware 1510.

Machine Learning Neural Network Implementations

The computing architecture provided by embodiments described herein can be configured to perform the types of parallel processing that is particularly suited for training and deploying neural networks for machine learning. A neural network can be generalized as a network of functions having a graph relationship. As is known in the art, there are a variety of types of neural network implementations used in machine learning. One exemplary type of neural network is the feedforward network, as previously described.

A second exemplary type of neural network is the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). A CNN is a specialized feedforward neural network for processing data having a known, grid-like topology, such as image data. Accordingly, CNNs are commonly used for compute vision and image recognition applications, but they also may be used for other types of pattern recognition such as speech and language processing. The nodes in the CNN input layer are organized into a set of “filters” (feature detectors inspired by the receptive fields found in the retina), and the output of each set of filters is propagated to nodes in successive layers of the network. The computations for a CNN include applying the convolution mathematical operation to each filter to produce the output of that filter. Convolution is a specialized kind of mathematical operation performed by two functions to produce a third function that is a modified version of one of the two original functions. In convolutional network terminology, the first function to the convolution can be referred to as the input, while the second function can be referred to as the convolution kernel. The output may be referred to as the feature map. For example, the input to a convolution layer can be a multidimensional array of data that defines the various color components of an input image. The convolution kernel can be a multidimensional array of parameters, where the parameters are adapted by the training process for the neural network.

Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are a family of feedforward neural networks that include feedback connections between layers. RNNs enable modeling of sequential data by sharing parameter data across different parts of the neural network. The architecture for a RNN includes cycles. The cycles represent the influence of a present value of a variable on its own value at a future time, as at least a portion of the output data from the RNN is used as feedback for processing subsequent input in a sequence. This feature makes RNNs particularly useful for language processing due to the variable nature in which language data can be composed.

The figures described below present exemplary feedforward, CNN, and RNN networks, as well as describe a general process for respectively training and deploying each of those types of networks. It will be understood that these descriptions are exemplary and non-limiting as to any specific embodiment described herein and the concepts illustrated can be applied generally to deep neural networks and machine learning techniques in general.

The exemplary neural networks described above can be used to perform deep learning. Deep learning is machine learning using deep neural networks. The deep neural networks used in deep learning are artificial neural networks composed of multiple hidden layers, as opposed to shallow neural networks that include only a single hidden layer. Deeper neural networks are generally more computationally intensive to train. However, the additional hidden layers of the network enable multistep pattern recognition that results in reduced output error relative to shallow machine learning techniques.

Deep neural networks used in deep learning typically include a front-end network to perform feature recognition coupled to a back-end network which represents a mathematical model that can perform operations (e.g., object classification, speech recognition, etc.) based on the feature representation provided to the model. Deep learning enables machine learning to be performed without requiring hand crafted feature engineering to be performed for the model. Instead, deep neural networks can learn features based on statistical structure or correlation within the input data. The learned features can be provided to a mathematical model that can map detected features to an output. The mathematical model used by the network is generally specialized for the specific task to be performed, and different models will be used to perform different task.

Once the neural network is structured, a learning model can be applied to the network to train the network to perform specific tasks. The learning model describes how to adjust the weights within the model to reduce the output error of the network. Backpropagation of errors is a common method used to train neural networks. An input vector is presented to the network for processing. The output of the network is compared to the desired output using a loss function and an error value is calculated for each of the neurons in the output layer. The error values are then propagated backwards until each neuron has an associated error value which roughly represents its contribution to the original output. The network can then learn from those errors using an algorithm, such as the stochastic gradient descent algorithm, to update the weights of the of the neural network.

FIGS. 16A-16B illustrate an exemplary convolutional neural network. FIG. 16A illustrates various layers within a CNN. As shown in FIG. 16A, an exemplary CNN used to model image processing can receive input 1602 describing the red, green, and blue (RGB) components of an input image. The input 1602 can be processed by multiple convolutional layers (e.g., first convolutional layer 1604, second convolutional layer 1606). The output from the multiple convolutional layers may optionally be processed by a set of fully connected layers 1608. Neurons in a fully connected layer have full connections to all activations in the previous layer, as previously described for a feedforward network. The output from the fully connected layers 1608 can be used to generate an output result from the network. The activations within the fully connected layers 1608 can be computed using matrix multiplication instead of convolution. Not all CNN implementations are make use of fully connected layers 1608. For example, in some implementations the second convolutional layer 1606 can generate output for the CNN.

The convolutional layers are sparsely connected, which differs from traditional neural network configuration found in the fully connected layers 1608. Traditional neural network layers are fully connected, such that every output unit interacts with every input unit. However, the convolutional layers are sparsely connected because the output of the convolution of a field is input (instead of the respective state value of each of the nodes in the field) to the nodes of the subsequent layer, as illustrated. The kernels associated with the convolutional layers perform convolution operations, the output of which is sent to the next layer. The dimensionality reduction performed within the convolutional layers is one aspect that enables the CNN to scale to process large images.

FIG. 16B illustrates exemplary computation stages within a convolutional layer of a CNN. Input to a convolutional layer 1612 of a CNN can be processed in three stages of a convolutional layer 1614. The three stages can include a convolution stage 1616, a detector stage 1618, and a pooling stage 1620. The convolution layer 1614 can then output data to a successive convolutional layer. The final convolutional layer of the network can generate output feature map data or provide input to a fully connected layer, for example, to generate a classification value for the input to the CNN.

In the convolution stage 1616 performs several convolutions in parallel to produce a set of linear activations. The convolution stage 1616 can include an affine transformation, which is any transformation that can be specified as a linear transformation plus a translation. Affine transformations include rotations, translations, scaling, and combinations of these transformations. The convolution stage computes the output of functions (e.g., neurons) that are connected to specific regions in the input, which can be determined as the local region associated with the neuron. The neurons compute a dot product between the weights of the neurons and the region in the local input to which the neurons are connected. The output from the convolution stage 1616 defines a set of linear activations that are processed by successive stages of the convolutional layer 1614.

The linear activations can be processed by a detector stage 1618. In the detector stage 1618, each linear activation is processed by a non-linear activation function. The non-linear activation function increases the nonlinear properties of the overall network without affecting the receptive fields of the convolution layer. Several types of non-linear activation functions may be used. One particular type is the rectified linear unit (ReLU), which uses an activation function defined as ƒ(x)=max(0, x), such that the activation is thresholded at zero.

The pooling stage 1620 uses a pooling function that replaces the output of the second convolutional layer 1606 with a summary statistic of the nearby outputs. The pooling function can be used to introduce translation invariance into the neural network, such that small translations to the input do not change the pooled outputs. Invariance to local translation can be useful in scenarios where the presence of a feature in the input data is more important than the precise location of the feature. Various types of pooling functions can be used during the pooling stage 1620, including max pooling, average pooling, and 12-norm pooling. Additionally, some CNN implementations do not include a pooling stage. Instead, such implementations substitute and additional convolution stage having an increased stride relative to previous convolution stages.

The output from the convolutional layer 1614 can then be processed by the next layer 1622. The next layer 1622 can be an additional convolutional layer or one of the fully connected layers 1608. For example, the first convolutional layer 1604 of FIG. 16A can output to the second convolutional layer 1606, while the second convolutional layer can output to a first layer of the fully connected layers 1608.

FIG. 17 illustrates an exemplary recurrent neural network. In a recurrent neural network (RNN), the previous state of the network influences the output of the current state of the network. RNNs can be built in a variety of ways using a variety of functions. The use of RNNs generally revolves around using mathematical models to predict the future based on a prior sequence of inputs. For example, an RNN may be used to perform statistical language modeling to predict an upcoming word given a previous sequence of words. The illustrated RNN 1700 can be described as having an input layer 1702 that receives an input vector, hidden layers 1704 to implement a recurrent function, a feedback mechanism 1705 to enable a ‘memory’ of previous states, and an output layer 1706 to output a result. The RNN 1700 operates based on time-steps. The state of the RNN at a given time step is influenced based on the previous time step via the feedback mechanism 1705. For a given time step, the state of the hidden layers 1704 is defined by the previous state and the input at the current time step. An initial input (x₁) at a first time step can be processed by the hidden layer 1704. A second input (x₂) can be processed by the hidden layer 1704 using state information that is determined during the processing of the initial input (x₁). A given state can be computed as s_(t)=ƒ(Ux_(t)+Ws_(t-1)), where U and W are parameter matrices. The function ƒ is generally a nonlinearity, such as the hyperbolic tangent function (Tan h) or a variant of the rectifier function ƒ(x)=max(0, x). However, the specific mathematical function used in the hidden layers 1704 can vary depending on the specific implementation details of the RNN 1700.

In addition to the basic CNN and RNN networks described, variations on those networks may be enabled. One example RNN variant is the long short-term memory (LSTM) RNN. LSTM RNNs are capable of learning long-term dependencies that may be necessary for processing longer sequences of language. A variant on the CNN is a convolutional deep belief network, which has a structure similar to a CNN and is trained in a manner similar to a deep belief network. A deep belief network (DBN) is a generative neural network that is composed of multiple layers of stochastic (random) variables. DBNs can be trained layer-by-layer using greedy unsupervised learning. The learned weights of the DBN can then be used to provide pre-train neural networks by determining an optimal initial set of weights for the neural network.

FIG. 18 illustrates training and deployment of a deep neural network. Once a given network has been structured for a task the neural network is trained using a training dataset 1802. Various training frameworks have been developed to enable hardware acceleration of the training process. For example, the machine learning framework 1504 of FIG. 15 may be configured as a training framework 1804. The training framework 1804 can hook into an untrained neural network 1806 and enable the untrained neural net to be trained using the parallel processing resources described herein to generate a trained neural network 1808. To start the training process the initial weights may be chosen randomly or by pre-training using a deep belief network. The training cycle then be performed in either a supervised or unsupervised manner.

Supervised learning is a learning method in which training is performed as a mediated operation, such as when the training dataset 1802 includes input paired with the desired output for the input, or where the training dataset includes input having known output and the output of the neural network is manually graded. The network processes the inputs and compares the resulting outputs against a set of expected or desired outputs. Errors are then propagated back through the system. The training framework 1804 can adjust to adjust the weights that control the untrained neural network 1806. The training framework 1804 can provide tools to monitor how well the untrained neural network 1806 is converging towards a model suitable to generating correct answers based on known input data. The training process occurs repeatedly as the weights of the network are adjusted to refine the output generated by the neural network. The training process can continue until the neural network reaches a statistically desired accuracy associated with a trained neural network 1808. The trained neural network 1808 can then be deployed to implement any number of machine learning operations.

Unsupervised learning is a learning method in which the network attempts to train itself using unlabeled data. Thus, for unsupervised learning the training dataset 1802 will include input data without any associated output data. The untrained neural network 1806 can learn groupings within the unlabeled input and can determine how individual inputs are related to the overall dataset. Unsupervised training can be used to generate a self-organizing map, which is a type of trained neural network 1807 capable of performing operations useful in reducing the dimensionality of data. Unsupervised training can also be used to perform anomaly detection, which allows the identification of data points in an input dataset that deviate from the normal patterns of the data.

Variations on supervised and unsupervised training may also be employed. Semi-supervised learning is a technique in which in the training dataset 1802 includes a mix of labeled and unlabeled data of the same distribution. Incremental learning is a variant of supervised learning in which input data is continuously used to further train the model. Incremental learning enables the trained neural network 1808 to adapt to the new data 1812 without forgetting the knowledge instilled within the network during initial training.

Whether supervised or unsupervised, the training process for particularly deep neural networks may be too computationally intensive for a single compute node. Instead of using a single compute node, a distributed network of computational nodes can be used to accelerate the training process.

FIG. 19 is a block diagram illustrating distributed learning. Distributed learning is a training model that uses multiple distributed computing nodes to perform supervised or unsupervised training of a neural network. The distributed computational nodes can each include one or more host processors and one or more of the general-purpose processing nodes. As illustrated, distributed learning can be performed model parallelism 1902, data parallelism 1904, or a combination of model and data parallelism 1904.

In model parallelism 1902, different computational nodes in a distributed system can perform training computations for different parts of a single network. For example, each layer of a neural network can be trained by a different processing node of the distributed system. The benefits of model parallelism include the ability to scale to particularly large models. Splitting the computations associated with different layers of the neural network enables the training of very large neural networks in which the weights of all layers would not fit into the memory of a single computational node. In some instances, model parallelism can be particularly useful in performing unsupervised training of large neural networks.

In data parallelism 1904, the different nodes of the distributed network have a complete instance of the model and each node receives a different portion of the data. The results from the different nodes are then combined. While different approaches to data parallelism are possible, data parallel training approaches all require a technique of combining results and synchronizing the model parameters between each node. Exemplary approaches to combining data include parameter averaging and update based data parallelism. Parameter averaging trains each node on a subset of the training data and sets the global parameters (e.g., weights, biases) to the average of the parameters from each node. Parameter averaging uses a central parameter server that maintains the parameter data. Update based data parallelism is similar to parameter averaging except that instead of transferring parameters from the nodes to the parameter server, the updates to the model are transferred. Additionally, update based data parallelism can be performed in a decentralized manner, where the updates are compressed and transferred between nodes.

Combined model and data parallelism 1906 can be implemented, for example, in a distributed system in which each computational node includes multiple GPUs. Each node can have a complete instance of the model with separate GPUs within each node are used to train different portions of the model.

Distributed training has increased overhead relative to training on a single machine. However, the parallel processors and GPGPUs described herein can each implement various techniques to reduce the overhead of distributed training, including techniques to enable high bandwidth GPU-to-GPU data transfer and accelerated remote data synchronization.

Exemplary Machine Learning Applications

Machine learning can be applied to solve a variety of technological problems, including but not limited to computer vision, autonomous driving and navigation, speech recognition, and language processing. Computer vision has traditionally been one of the most active research areas for machine learning applications. Applications of computer vision range from reproducing human visual abilities, such as recognizing faces, to creating new categories of visual abilities. For example, computer vision applications can be configured to recognize sound waves from the vibrations induced in objects visible in a video. Parallel processor accelerated machine learning enables computer vision applications to be trained using significantly larger training dataset than previously feasible and enables inferencing systems to be deployed using low power parallel processors.

Parallel processor accelerated machine learning has autonomous driving applications including lane and road sign recognition, obstacle avoidance, navigation, and driving control. Accelerated machine learning techniques can be used to train driving models based on datasets that define the appropriate responses to specific training input. The parallel processors described herein can enable rapid training of the increasingly complex neural networks used for autonomous driving solutions and enables the deployment of low power inferencing processors in a mobile platform suitable for integration into autonomous vehicles.

Parallel processor accelerated deep neural networks have enabled machine learning approaches to automatic speech recognition (ASR). ASR includes the creation of a function that computes the most probable linguistic sequence given an input acoustic sequence. Accelerated machine learning using deep neural networks have enabled the replacement of the hidden Markov models (HMMs) and Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) previously used for ASR.

Parallel processor accelerated machine learning can also be used to accelerate natural language processing. Automatic learning procedures can make use of statistical inference algorithms to produce models that are robust to erroneous or unfamiliar input. Exemplary natural language processor applications include automatic machine translation between human languages.

The parallel processing platforms used for machine learning can be divided into training platforms and deployment platforms. Training platforms are generally highly parallel and include optimizations to accelerate multi-GPU single node training and multi-node, multi-GPU training, while deployed machine learning (e.g., inferencing) platforms generally include lower power parallel processors suitable for use in products such as cameras, autonomous robots, and autonomous vehicles.

FIG. 20 illustrates a computing device 2000 hosting a no-reference anomaly detection mechanism (“no-reference mechanism”) 2010 according to one embodiment. Computing device 2000 represents a communication and data processing device including or representing (without limitation) smart voice command devices, intelligent personal assistants, home/office automation system, home appliances (e.g., washing machines, television sets, etc.), mobile devices (e.g., smartphones, tablet computers, etc.), gaming devices, handheld devices, wearable devices (e.g., smartwatches, smart bracelets, etc.), virtual reality (VR) devices, head-mounted displays (HMDs), Internet of Things (IoT) devices, laptop computers, desktop computers, server computers, set-top boxes (e.g., Internet-based cable television set-top boxes, etc.), global positioning system (GPS)-based devices, automotive infotainment devices, etc.

In some embodiments, computing device 2000 includes or works with or is embedded in or facilitates any number and type of other smart devices, such as (without limitation) autonomous machines or artificially intelligent agents, such as a mechanical agents or machines, electronics agents or machines, virtual agents or machines, electro-mechanical agents or machines, etc. Examples of autonomous machines or artificially intelligent agents may include (without limitation) robots, autonomous vehicles (e.g., self-driving cars, self-flying planes, self-sailing boats, etc.), autonomous equipment (self-operating construction vehicles, self-operating medical equipment, etc.), and/or the like. Further, “autonomous vehicles” are not limited to automobiles but that they may include any number and type of autonomous machines, such as robots, autonomous equipment, household autonomous devices, and/or the like, and any one or more tasks or operations relating to such autonomous machines may be interchangeably referenced with autonomous driving.

Further, for example, computing device 2000 may include a computer platform hosting an integrated circuit (“IC”), such as a system on a chip (“SoC” or “SOC”), integrating various hardware and/or software components of computing device 2000 on a single chip. For example, computing device 2000 comprises a data processing device having one or more processors including (but not limited to) central processing unit 2012 and graphics processing unit 2014 that are co-located on a common semiconductor package.

As illustrated, in one embodiment, computing device 2000 may include any number and type of hardware and/or software components, such as (without limitation) graphics processing unit (“GPU” or simply “graphics processor”) 2014, graphics driver (also referred to as “GPU driver”, “graphics driver logic”, “driver logic”, user-mode driver (UMD), UMD, user-mode driver framework (UMDF), UMDF, or simply “driver”) 116, central processing unit (“CPU” or simply “application processor”) 2012, memory 2004, network devices, drivers, and/or the like, as well as input/output (I/O) source(s) 2008, such as touchscreens, touch panels, touch pads, virtual or regular keyboards, virtual or regular mice, ports, connectors, etc. Computing device 2000 may include operating system (OS) 2006 serving as an interface between hardware and/or physical resources of the computing device 2000 and a user.

It is to be appreciated that a lesser or more equipped system than the example described above may be preferred for certain implementations. Therefore, any configuration of computing device 2000 may vary from implementation to implementation depending upon numerous factors, such as price constraints, performance requirements, technological improvements, or other circumstances.

Embodiments may be implemented as any or a combination of: one or more microchips or integrated circuits interconnected using a parentboard, hardwired logic, software stored by a memory device and executed by a microprocessor, firmware, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), and/or a field programmable gate array (FPGA). Terms like “logic”, “module”, “component”, “engine”, “circuitry”, “element”, and “mechanism” may include, by way of example, software, hardware, firmware, and/or a combination thereof.

In one embodiment, as illustrated, no-reference mechanism 2010 may be hosted by memory 2004 in communication with I/O source(s) 2008, such as microphones, speakers, etc., of computing device 2000. In another embodiment, no-reference mechanism 2010 may be part of or hosted by operating system 2006. In yet another embodiment, no-reference mechanism 2010 may be hosted or facilitated by graphics driver 116. In yet another embodiment, no-reference mechanism 2010 may be hosted by or part of graphics processing unit (“GPU” or simply graphics processor”) 2014 or firmware of graphics processor 2014; for example, no-reference mechanism 2010 may be embedded in or implemented as part of the processing hardware of graphics processor 2014 in the form of misuse assessment component 2030. Similarly, in yet another embodiment, no-reference mechanism 2010 may be hosted by or part of central processing unit (“CPU” or simply “application processor”) 2012; for example, no-reference mechanism 2010 may be embedded in or implemented as part of the processing hardware of application processor 2012 in the form of no-reference anomaly detection component (“no-reference component”) 2020.

For example, no-reference components 2020, 2030 and/or any elements of no-reference mechanism 2010 may be implemented by one or more analog or digital circuits, logic circuits, programmable processors, programmable controllers, GPUs, digital signal processors (DSPs), application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), and/or field programmable logic devices (FPLDs).

It is contemplated that this novel technique is not limited to a software implementation or a hardware implementation and, as will be further described in this document, this novel technique may be applied and implemented in software, hardware, firmware, or any combination thereof. It is, therefore, further contemplated that embodiments are not limited to certain implementation or hosting of no-reference mechanism 2010 and that one or more portions or components of no-reference mechanism 2010 may be employed or implemented as hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof. Further, as used herein, the phrase “in communication,” including variations thereof, encompasses direct communication and/or indirect communication through one or more intermediary components, and does not require direct physical (e.g., wired) communication and/or constant communication, but rather additionally includes selective communication at periodic intervals, scheduled intervals, aperiodic intervals, and/or one-time events.

Computing device 2000 may host network interface device(s) to provide access to a network, such as a LAN, a wide area network (WAN), a metropolitan area network (MAN), a personal area network (PAN), Bluetooth, a cloud network, a mobile network (e.g., 3^(rd) Generation (3G), 4^(th) Generation (4G), etc.), an intranet, the Internet, etc. Network interface(s) may include, for example, a wireless network interface having antenna, which may represent one or more antenna(e). Network interface(s) may also include, for example, a wired network interface to communicate with remote devices via network cable, which may be, for example, an Ethernet cable, a coaxial cable, a fiber optic cable, a serial cable, or a parallel cable.

Embodiments may be provided, for example, as a computer program product which may include one or more machine-readable media having stored thereon machine-executable instructions that, when executed by one or more machines such as a computer, a data processing machine, a data processing device, network of computers, or other electronic devices, may result in the one or more machines carrying out operations in accordance with embodiments described herein. As described with reference to FIG. 1, a machine may include one or more processors, such as a CPU, a GPU, etc. A machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, Compact Disc-Read Only Memories (CD-ROMs), magneto-optical disks, ROMs, Random Access Memories (RAMs), Erasable Programmable Read Only Memories (EPROMs), Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memories (EEPROMs), magnetic or optical cards, flash memory, or other type of media/machine-readable medium suitable for storing machine-executable instructions.

For example, when reading any of the apparatus, method, or system claims of this patent to cover a purely software and/or firmware implementation, at least one element of no-reference components 2020, 2030 and/or no-reference mechanism 2010 may be expressly defined to include a non-transitory computer readable storage device or storage disk such as a memory, a digital versatile disk (DVD), a compact disk (CD), a Blu-ray disk, etc., including the software and/or firmware.

Moreover, one or more elements of no-reference components 2020, 2030 and/or no-reference mechanism 2010 may be downloaded as a computer program product, wherein the program may be transferred from a remote computer (e.g., a server) to a requesting computer (e.g., a client) by way of one or more data signals embodied in and/or modulated by a carrier wave or other propagation medium via a communication link (e.g., a modem and/or network connection).

Throughout this document, the term “user” may be interchangeably referred to as “viewer”, “observer”, “speaker”, “person”, “individual”, “end-user”, “developer”, “programmer”, “administrators”, and/or the like. For example, in some cases, a user may refer to an end-user, such as a consumer accessing a client computing device, while, in some other cases, a user may include a developer, a programmer, a system administrator, etc., accessing a workstation serving as a client computing device. It is to be noted that throughout this document, terms like “graphics domain” may be referenced interchangeably with “graphics processing unit”, “graphics processor”, or simply “GPU”; similarly, “CPU domain” or “host domain” may be referenced interchangeably with “computer processing unit”, “application processor”, or simply “CPU”.

It is to be noted that terms like “node”, “computing node”, “server”, “server device”, “cloud computer”, “cloud server”, “cloud server computer”, “machine”, “host machine”, “device”, “computing device”, “computer”, “computing system”, and the like, may be used interchangeably throughout this document. It is to be further noted that terms like “application”, “software application”, “program”, “software program”, “package”, “software package”, and the like, may be used interchangeably throughout this document.

Further, throughout this document, terms like “request”, “query”, “job”, “work”, “work item”, and “workload” are referenced interchangeably. Similarly, an “application” or “agent” may refer to or include a computer program, a software application, a game, a workstation application, etc., offered through an application programming interface (API), such as a free rendering API, such as Open Graphics Library (OpenGL®), DirectX® 11, DirectX® 12, etc., where “dispatch” may be interchangeably referenced as “work unit” or “draw”, while “application” may be interchangeably referred to as “workflow” or simply “agent”.

For example, a workload, such as that of a three-dimensional (3D) game, may include and issue any number and type of “frames” where each frame may represent an image (e.g., sailboat, human face). Further, each frame may include and offer any number and type of work units, where each work unit may represent a part (e.g., mast of sailboat, forehead of human face) of the image (e.g., sailboat, human face) represented by its corresponding frame. However, for the sake of consistency, each item may be referenced by a single term (e.g., “dispatch”, “agent”, etc.) throughout this document.

In some embodiments, terms like “display screen” and “display surface” may be used interchangeably referring to the visible portion of a display device while the rest of the display device may be embedded into a computing device, such as a smartphone, a wearable device, etc. It is contemplated and to be noted that embodiments are not limited to any specific computing device, software application, hardware component, display device, display screen or surface, protocol, standard, etc. For example, embodiments may be applied to and used with any number and type of real-time applications on any number and type of computers, such as desktops, laptops, tablet computers, smartphones, head-mounted displays and other wearable devices, and/or the like. Further, for example, rendering scenarios for efficient performance using this novel technique may range from simple scenarios, such as desktop compositing, to complex scenarios, such as 3D games, augmented reality applications, etc.

It is to be noted that terms like artificial intelligence (“AI”) model, explainable AI (“XAI”) model, machine learning (“ML”) model, deep learning (“DL”) model, neural network (“NN”) model, or simply “model”, and/or the like, are interchangeably referenced throughout this document. Further, terms like “autonomous machine” or simply “machine”, “autonomous vehicle” or simply “vehicle”, “autonomous agent” or simply “agent”, “autonomous device” or simply “device”, as well as “computing device”, “robot”, and/or the like, may be interchangeably referenced throughout this document.

FIG. 21 illustrates no-reference anomaly detection mechanism 2010 of FIG. 20 according to one embodiment. For brevity, many of the details already discussed with reference to FIGS. 1-20 are not repeated or discussed hereafter. In one embodiment, no-reference mechanism 2010 may include any number and type of components, such as (without limitations): detection and monitoring logic 2101; acquisition and calibration logic 2103; framing and processing logic 2105; model selection and inference logic 2107; and communication/compatibility logic 2109.

As will be further described throughout this document, in some embodiments and as illustrated in FIG. 20, no-reference anomaly detection may be achieved through one or more components or circuitry embedded in or hosted by one or more processing devices, such as no-reference components 2020 and/or 2030 at application processor 2012 and graphics processor 2014, respectively. For the sake of brevity and ease of understanding, most of the discussion throughout this document revolved around and is based on no-reference mechanism 2010, while only in some cases, no-reference components 2020, 2030 are referenced. Nevertheless, it is contemplated that in some embodiment no-reference mechanism 2010 and/or one or more of no-reference components 2020, 2030 may be used to performance any of pertinent tasks to achieve no-reference detection of anomalies in images.

Computing device 2000 is further shown to include user interface 2119 (e.g., graphical user interface (GUI)-based user interface, Web browser, cloud-based platform user interface, software application-based user interface, other user or application programming interfaces (APIs), etc.). Computing device 2000 may further include 110 source(s) 2008 having input component(s) 2131, such as camera(s) 2142 (e.g., Intel® RealSense™ camera), microphone(s) 2141, sensors, detectors, keyboards, mice, etc., and output component(s) 2133, such as display device(s) or simply display(s) 2144 (e.g., integral displays, tensor displays, projection screens, display screens, etc.), speaker devices(s) or simply speaker(s), etc.

Computing device 2000 is further illustrated as having access to and/or being in communication with one or more database(s) 2025 and/or one or more of other computing devices over one or more communication medium(s) 2030 (e.g., networks such as a proximity network, a cloud network, an intranet, the Internet, etc.).

In some embodiments, database(s) 2025 may include one or more of storage mediums or devices, repositories, data sources, etc., having any amount and type of information, such as data, metadata, etc., relating to any number and type of applications, such as data and/or metadata relating to one or more users, physical locations or areas, applicable laws, policies and/or regulations, user preferences and/or profiles, security and/or authentication data, historical and/or preferred details, and/or the like.

As aforementioned, computing device 2000 may host I/O source(s) 2008 including input component(s) 2131 and output component(s) 2133. In one embodiment, input component(s) 2131 may include a sensor array including, but not limited to, microphone(s) 2141 (e.g., ultrasound microphones), camera(s) 2142 (e.g., two-dimensional (2D) cameras, three-dimensional (3D) cameras, infrared (IR) cameras, depth-sensing cameras, etc.), capacitors, radio components, radar components, scanners, and/or accelerometers, etc. Similarly, output component(s) 2133 may include any number and type of display device(s) 2144, projectors, light-emitting diodes (LEDs), speaker(s) 2143, and/or vibration motors, etc.

As aforementioned, terms like “logic”, “module”, “component”, “engine”, “circuitry”, “element”, and “mechanism” may include, by way of example, software, hardware, firmware, and/or any combination thereof. For example, logic may itself be or include or be associated with circuitry at one or more devices, such as no-reference component 2030 and/or misuse assessment component 2020 hosted by application processor 2012 and/or graphics processor 2014, respectively, of FIG. 20 having to facilitate or execute the corresponding logic to perform certain tasks.

For example, as illustrated, input component(s) 2131 may include any number and type of microphones(s) 2141, such as multiple microphones or a microphone array, such as ultrasound microphones, dynamic microphones, fiber optic microphones, laser microphones, etc. It is contemplated that one or more of microphone(s) 2141 serve as one or more input devices for accepting or receiving audio inputs (such as human voice) into computing device 2000 and converting this audio or sound into electrical signals. Similarly, it is contemplated that one or more of camera(s) 2142 serve as one or more input devices for detecting and capturing of image and/or videos of scenes, objects, etc., and provide the captured data as video inputs into computing device 2000.

As described earlier, conventional techniques for detecting anomalies in images or video streams require manual validation and/or are reference-based. For example, such techniques rely on human eyes of a trained engineer or a contingent worker to look at a monitor for images to identify anomalies and further, these techniques may require manual examination or known graded references that are replayed on a test system and compared with known good results.

Stated differently, such conventional techniques are error prone, subjective, inefficient, and unscalable. Error prone, because these techniques require manual detection of visual anomalies and naturally, humans can be distracted and missing out critical anomalies on the screen. The issue with subjectivity is also due to the use of manual work by humans, because the exact labeling of complicated cases caused by subtle corruptions will have to depend on a person and different persons, such as engineers, could provide different findings even when labeling the same image or video.

Similarly, conventional techniques are inefficient because for only a limited time, an engineer could be expected to work or focus on identifying corruptions on a screen and therefore, conventional techniques lack the 24/7 capability to aid validation results, which, in turn, leads to inefficiency and downtime. Further, given these conventional techniques are either manual or reference-based, such as requiring graded references for replaying on test systems, this manual examination and/or dependency on references lacks scalability because real-world contents are not fixed or static to wait for references. For example, using conventional techniques, pre-profiling of expected outputs may not be produced to then be used in comparison against test outputs in a scalable manner.

Embodiments, as facilitated by no-reference mechanism 2010, provide for a novel technique to offer a scalable, no-reference, solution to capture any media information (e.g., images, videos, etc.) being rendered on computer screens, such as display device(s) 244, using cameras, such as camera(s) 242, and the process these captured media of images/videos into frames, and analyze them using deep neural networks and pertinent deep neural network training and learning algorithms. In one embodiment, this novel technique is performed using frame characteristics per frame and temporal correlation between successive frames to accurately detect visual artifacts, etc.

It is contemplated that deep learning has shown promising results in the field of computer vision, such as various deep learning frameworks (e.g., Caffe™, TensorFlow™) and hardware platform inference engines (e.g., Movidius™) have been used in performing image-based inference. Further, for example, when such frameworks are used in video analytics, such as digital surveillance, etc., they are to perform independent inferences on consecutive frames by ignoring the redundancies among those frames.

Embodiments, as facilitated by no-reference mechanism 2010, provide for this novel technique for no-reference anomaly detection through deep learning by intelligently performing data acquisition, data processing, and inference. For example, detection and monitoring logic 2101 may be used with one or more camera(s) to 242 capture images/videos of scenes having persons, animals, plants, and/or other objects, where the scenes are capable of being displayed on one or more display device(s) 244. In one embodiment, detection and monitoring logic 2101 is further to continuously detect and monitor any media (e.g., images, videos, etc.) that is captured and/or displayed.

As detection and monitoring logic 2101 facilitates certain operations and processes, acquisition and calibration logic 2103 is triggered to initiate calibration of camera(s) 2142 to ensure camera(s) 2142 are calibrated to a level where they can capture frames of images or videos in a certain manner and at a certain frequency. In one embodiment, this manner and frequency may be predetermined based on a variety of factors, such as type and make of camera(s) 2142, type of images/video being captured, lighting, time of day, etc. The calibration threshold is applied to achieve maximum efficiency in terms of capturing and processing of frames for detection of anomalies in their contents.

For example, acquisition and calibration logic 2103 may be used to calibrate camera(s) 242 to start and continue with capturing of frames of images/videos that are 5 seconds long. In some embodiments, acquisition and calibration logic 2103 may continue to calibrate camera(s) 242 until calibration is successful, such as until camera(s) 242 are set to capture 5-second image/video frames of scenes. These calibration camera(s) 242 may continue to function at the set calibration threshold for as long as desired or necessitated, such as continue or stop at reaching a predetermined time period, such as one hour, 30 minutes, etc.

In one embodiment, using acquisition and calibration logic 2103 may facilitate or support a data acquisition system that includes one or more camera capture device systems, such as camera(s) 242, to capture contents, such as test data, from a workload on a computing platform using an imaging device. Further, for example, as facilitated by acquisition and calibration logic 2103, such contents (e.g., test data) may be captured in a controlled environment free from external light interferences, such as shadows, reflections, etc.

While camera(s) 242 may continue or stop at some point, any frames of contents (e.g., images, videos, etc.) captured by these camera(s) 242 are shared with framing and processing logic 2105 to further process these captured frames having media contents. In one embodiment, framing and processing logic 2105 may facilitate conversion of the captured contents, such as captured videos, into individual frames, such as splitting of a video in multiple frames. For example, as facilitated by framing and processing logic 2105, once any frames are extracted from a video, the images then shrunk to a smaller size, such as 448×448, and inputted into the inference engine as additional or field data to work with a trained neural network model for classification purposes.

As is contemplated and further illustrated with reference to FIG. 18, in a neural network transaction sequence, an untrained neural network model may be crated and then put through training using any training data that may have been collected over a great deal of time through various experiments, data acquisitions, etc. This training data may be critical in providing recognition of and distinction between various objects, such as cats and dogs. Once a neural network model is trained, it is then optimized for better usage and output through inference where new data, such as field data, is introduced to the trained model. This inference stage leads to optimization of the trained model that is not only trained, but also intelligent and optimized to facilitate tasks that are in accordance with what is expected from the model based on its training and inference.

In one embodiment, model selection and inference logic 2107 is used to facilitate the inference engine to identify statistical correlation between the test contents and any known good contents and known bad contents. As described earlier, the inference engine, as facilitated by model selection and inference logic 2107, may use a trained deep neural network model, such as an 18-layer deep neural network model, that has already gone through the training stage and is trained based on various pertinent training data sets. In one embodiment, these training data sets may include images (such as nearly 500,000 images) representing good images (e.g., images without any corruption, pollution, or anomalies, etc.), bad images (e.g., images with commonly seen and detected anomalies associated with graphics platform validation, etc.) to ensure a secured and complete training of the training model that is then put through inference, as facilitated by model selection and inference logic 2107, using the field data of data frames as prepared by framing and processing logic 2105. A few examples of uncorrupted and corrupted images for certain categories are shown in FIGS. 22A-2H.

In some embodiments, as facilitated by model selection and inference logic 2107, deep learning models are used to detect the presence of any corruption played content such that there may be two classes of model operations utilized by system, depending on the nature of corruption to be detected. This allows for a novel manner of deep learning modeling and data flow for no-reference detection of anomalies in images/videos.

In one embodiment, as facilitated by model selection and inference logic 2107, a single frame-based corruption detection model is used, where a first class of models detect single frames that contain corruption, such as horizontal line corruption, vertical line corruption, etc. In this case, for example, this single frame-based model operations separately and individually on each frame of a video stream and subsequently, a decision is taken with respect to each frame, as illustrated in FIG. 23A. In this embodiment, any corruption is detected and regarded for each frame.

In another embodiment, as facilitated by model selection and inference logic 2107, frame sequence-based corruption detection model is used, where each frame may be a regular frame on its own, while the overall appearance of an entire sequence of frames seems irregular, such as in case of flicker corruption. In this embodiment, any corruption is detected and regarded for a sequence of frames even if each individual frame may be entirely free of corruption. For example, for discovery of such cases, a time-based deep learning model may be used, where this time-based deep learning model accepts a sequence of frames as an input and returns a single output for the entire sequence or, in some cases, any number of sequences. Stated differently, any decision revealing any corruption or anomalies relates to an entire sequence of frames, as opposed to individual frames, such as the entire sequence being anomalous or corrupt (even if each individual frame in the anomalous sequence is regarded as regular, good, and uncorrupted). This technique is further illustrated with respect to FIG. 23B.

It is contemplated that certain parameters are used for performance of and achieving the results of this novel technique for no-reference detection of anomalies in images/video frames. For example, recall of a model refers to a percentage of corrupted frames that are correctly detected, while precision refers to a percentage of corrupted frames among the frames that are detected as corrupted. For example, Table 1 below shows recall and precision indicating no-reference detection performance of corruption in total test frames. It is contemplated and to be noted that Table 1 merely recites a few test results and outcomes and that embodiments are not limited as such.

TABLE 1 Performance of supervised and unsupervised models per corruption. Recall (%) for FPR of 0.1% Corruption Unsupervised FineTuned Ours Flicker 4.0 82.4 90.1 Triangle 1.4 19.1 25.3 Display stride 1.2 93.3 99.3 Vertical lines 5.2 85.7 99.4 Horizontal lines 0.9 90.9 99.4 Green flash 1.5 36.9 63.3 Color space change 14.1 79.0 79.5 Message Popup 11.0 80.5 93.1 Macro block 6.3 51.1 67.0

For example, recall and precision may be commonly-used metrics for automatic detection system performance and are easily translated in error measures by taking one hundred percent, using the metric as an error estimation. These metrics are also applicable to the human detection systems, in which humans classify objects, such as frames in some embodiments, into different categories (e.g., corrupted frames versus regular frames).

It is known that humans are prone to making errors, such as when classifying images into complex categories in a timely manner. Since the human error rate is inversely proportional to precision results, the higher the human error rate, the lower the precision results.

Embodiments provide for this novel technique for no-reference anomaly detection that achieves high precision results without any deterioration of the resulting corruption detection accuracy. Further, this novel technique is not misled by scene changes (e.g., ghost images), since the neural network models are trained with several examples of such varying cases, including both corrupted and non-corrupted images. This test is performed extensively to offer the maximum amount and the finest type of training data to be used to train neural network models, where most anomalies are detected on single frames as well as frame sequences based on detection of anomaly in such sequences (e.g., flicker).

As previously discussed, embodiments or implementation of no-reference mechanism 2010 and/or no-reference components 2020, 2030 are not limited to software, hardware, or a combination thereof. For example, hardware may include an optical imaging system, including camera(s) 242, etc., to test video cards and emulate the work performed by users (e.g., engineers) by recording the video signals that are observed during test cases, while avoiding obstructions, such as reflections. Further, for example, a video signal may be further processed through software components, such as those of no-reference mechanism 2010, to detect any possible malfunctioning of tested video cards. In one embodiment, such detection may be performed through deep learning algorithms, generating non-reference corruption detection using a combination of off-the-shelf techniques and specific inventive parts of this novel technique.

This novel technique, as facilitated by no-reference mechanism 2010 and/or one or more of no-reference components 2030, 2030, are based on several innovative aspects, such as from the design perspective, grabbing of video signals from video processing computer parts. Further, this approach deals with optical imaging parts, such as preventing reflections and controlling lighting conditions, while allowing testing of the entire system and end-to-end.

Moreover, from the algorithmic or software perspective, the task of corruption detection with no-reference and without limitation on played content, which is a novel application of deep learning. For example, conventional deep learning methods are applied to tasks of classifications where the objects in the images determine the category (e.g., class). Embodiments, on the other hand, provide for inventive application classes of images (e.g., corrupted, non-corrupted) are distinguished by small disturbances in the images, where the main content of the images do not influence any decision. This matter is achieved through a new specifically-tailored solution, including training of models with exact non-corrupt references for each of the corrupted images, to make it specifically learn the “noise” (where references are necessitated in training, but not when the model is used).

Embodiments further provide for a computationally efficient technique for video classification, where a task classifies a sequence of all images. In some corruptions, a sequence of frames may be an evidence of corruption in the tested video cards even if each individual frame is without corruption. Embodiments neither apply time consuming optical flow computations between consecutive frames nor utilize time-domain 3D CNN computations; rather, the novel technique relies on extracting task-specific features of the images and building time-domain models of those features using, for example, long short time memory (LSTM) deep learning models. This allows for accurate and fast real-time computations occur in the system, further allowing 24/7 operations. Stated differently, this novel technique allows for both from the system design perspective and the specifically-developed novel deep learning techniques.

Communication/compatibility logic 2109 may be used to facilitate the needed communication and compatibility between any number of devices of computing device 2000 and various components of no-reference mechanism 2010 and/or one or more of no-reference components 2020, 2030.

Communication/compatibility logic 2109 may be used to facilitate dynamic communication and compatibility between computing device 2000 and any number and type of other computing devices (such as mobile computing device, desktop computer, server computing device, etc.); processing devices or components (such as CPUs, GPUs, etc.); capturing/sensing/detecting devices (such as capturing/sensing components including cameras, depth sensing cameras, camera sensors, red green blue (RGB) sensors, microphones, etc.); display devices (such as output components including display screens, display areas, display projectors, etc.); user/context-awareness components and/or identification/verification sensors/devices (such as biometric sensors/detectors, scanners, etc.); database(s) 2130, such as memory or storage devices, databases, and/or data sources (such as data storage devices, hard drives, solid-state drives, hard disks, memory cards or devices, memory circuits, etc.); communication medium(s) 2125, such as one or more communication channels or networks (e.g., Cloud network, the Internet, intranet, cellular network, proximity networks, such as Bluetooth, Bluetooth low energy (BLE), Bluetooth Smart, Wi-Fi proximity, Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), Near Field Communication (NFC), Body Area Network (BAN), etc.); wireless or wired communications and relevant protocols (e.g., Wi-Fi®, WiMAX, Ethernet, etc.); connectivity and location management techniques; software applications/websites (e.g., social and/or business networking websites, etc., business applications, games and other entertainment applications, etc.); and programming languages, etc., while ensuring compatibility with changing technologies, parameters, protocols, standards, etc.

Throughout this document, terms like “logic”, “component”, “module”, “framework”, “engine”, “mechanism”, “unit”, “circuit”, and “circuitry”, and/or the like, are referenced interchangeably and may include, by way of example, software, hardware, firmware, or any combination thereof. In one example, “logic” may refer to or include a software component to work with one or more of an operating system (e.g., operating system 2006), a graphics driver (e.g., graphics driver 2016), etc., of a computing device, such as computing device 2000. In another example, “logic” may refer to or include a hardware component that is physically installed along with or as part of one or more system hardware elements, such as an application processor (e.g., CPU 2012), a graphics processor (e.g., GPU 2014), etc., of a computing device, such as computing device 2000. In yet another embodiment, “logic” may refer to or include a firmware component that is capable of being part of system firmware, such as firmware of an application processor (e.g., CPU 2012) or a graphics processor (e.g., GPU 2014), etc., of a computing device, such as computing device 2000.

Further, any use of a particular brand, word, term, phrase, name, and/or acronym, such as “reference”, “no-reference”, “visual anomaly”, “corruption”, “artifact”, “anomaly detection”, “graphics platform validation”, “deep learning”, “neural network model”, “layer”, “neural network”, “GPU”, “GPU domain”, “GPGPU”, “CPU”, “CPU domain”, “graphics driver”, “workload”, “application”, “graphics pipeline”, “pipeline processes”, “register”, “register file”, “RF”, “extended register file”, “ERF”, “execution unit”, “EU”, “instruction”, “API”, “3D API”, “OpenGL®”, “DirectX®”, “fragment shader”, “YUV texture”, “shader execution”, “existing UAV capabilities”, “existing backend”, “hardware”, “software”, “agent”, “graphics driver”, “kernel mode graphics driver”, “user-mode driver”, “user-mode driver framework”, “buffer”, “graphics buffer”, “task”, “process”, “operation”, “software application”, “game”, etc., should not be read to limit embodiments to software or devices that carry that label in products or in literature external to this document.

It is contemplated that any number and type of components may be added to and/or removed from no-reference mechanism 2010 and/or no-reference components 2020, 2030 to facilitate various embodiments including adding, removing, and/or enhancing certain features. For brevity, clarity, and ease of understanding of inference acceleration mechanism 2010 and/or no-reference components 2020, 2030, many of the standard and/or known components, such as those of a computing device, are not shown or discussed here. It is contemplated that embodiments, as described herein, are not limited to any technology, topology, system, architecture, and/or standard and are dynamic enough to adopt and adapt to any future changes.

FIGS. 22A, 22B, 22C, 22D, 22E, 22F, 22G, and 22H illustrate varying types of anomalies in images according to one embodiment. For brevity, many of the details previously discussed with reference to FIGS. 1-21 may not be discussed or repeated hereafter. As previously described in this document, there can be varying types of anomalies or corruptions targeting images. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 22A, image 2201 is a good image, while image 2203 inflicted with flicker corruption. Similarly, FIG. 22B illustrates good image 2211 and color space corrupted image 2213. FIG. 22C illustrates good image 2221 and horizontal line corrupted image 2223.

Continuing, FIG. 22D illustrates good image 2231 and vertical line corrupted image 2233. Similarly, FIG. 22E illustrates good image 2241 and macro block corrupted image 2243. For example, FIG. 22F illustrates good image 2251, while image 2253 is subject to serpent corruption. FIG. 22G illustrates good image 2261 and stride corrupted image 2263, while FIG. 22F illustrates good image 2271, and 3D triangle corrupted image 2273.

FIG. 23A illustrates a method 2300 for facilitating end-to-end no-reference detection of anomalies in digital images according to one embodiment. For brevity, many of the details previously discussed with reference to FIGS. 1-22F may not be discussed or repeated hereafter. Any processes relating to transaction sequence may be performed by processing logic that may comprise hardware (e.g., circuitry, dedicated logic, programmable logic, etc.), software (such as instructions run on a processing device), or a combination thereof, as facilitated by no-reference mechanism 2010 and/or one or more of no-reference components 2020, 2030 of FIG. 20. The processes associated with transaction sequence may be illustrated or recited in linear sequences for brevity and clarity in presentation; however, it is contemplated that any number of them can be performed in parallel, asynchronously, or in different orders.

Method 2300 begins at block 2301 with initiation of calibration of a camera to achieve predetermined calibration that is suitable for obtaining superior results in facilitating no-reference detection of anomalies. As part of the data acquisition stage, at block 2303, a determination is made as to whether the predetermined/suitable calibration is achieved. If not, the process for camera calibration continues at block 2301. If yes, then at block 2305, the camera is calibrated and started to begin capturing images in accordance with the set calibration, such as set to capture videos that are 5 seconds long, and/or the like. In some embodiments, upon capturing certain numbers and lengths of videos, the camera stops its operations, such as capturing videos, at block 2307.

As part of the data processing stage, videos captured by the camera are then communicated over to start the splitting of the video into frames, where each video is split into multiple frames, at block 2309. At block 2311, these videos frames submitted for inference to an inference engine. At block 2313, as part of the inference engine stage, the video frames are communicated over to initiate inference based on the frame splits, trained models, and any new field data obtained in real-time. At block 2315, this inference result is stored, where result indicates any number and type of anomalies in video frames such that certain anomalies are detected within a frame, while certain other anomalies are detected within a sequence of frames even if the individual frames are corruption-free.

FIG. 23B illustrates a transaction sequence 2330 for facilitating no-reference detection of anomalies in a single frame using deep learning according to one embodiment. For brevity, many of the details previously discussed with reference to FIGS. 1-23A may not be discussed or repeated hereafter. Any processes relating to transaction sequence may be performed by processing logic that may comprise hardware (e.g., circuitry, dedicated logic, programmable logic, etc.), software (such as instructions run on a processing device), or a combination thereof, as facilitated by no-reference mechanism 2010 and/or one or more of no-reference components 2020, 2030 of FIG. 20. The processes associated with transaction sequence may be illustrated or recited in linear sequences for brevity and clarity in presentation; however, it is contemplated that any number of them can be performed in parallel, asynchronously, or in different orders.

Transaction sequence 2330 begins at block 2331 with selection of a single frame of multiple frames for detection of anomalies, corruption, etc., in this single frame using deep learning as described with reference to FIG. 21. Transaction sequence 2330 continues with facilitating convolution of linear filter at block 2333, non-linear mapping at block 2335, and subsampling at block 2337. In one embodiment, transaction sequence 2330 continues with reducing the frame size of the single frame at block 2339, where the size may be reduced by splitting the single frame into several portions.

As illustrated, transaction sequence 2330 the repeats one or more of the above-mentioned processes using deep learning, such as facilitating convolution of linear filter at block 2341, non-linear mapping at block 2343, and subsampling at block 2345, and reducing the frame size of the single frame at block 2347. At block 2349, in one embodiment, a frame score (reflecting confidence based on the purity level of the single frame) is computed and at block 2351, this frame score is then compared with a predetermined confidence threshold appropriate for this frame to determine any corruption in the single frame. For example, certain level of discrepancy between the computed frame score and the predetermined frame threshold may indicate whether there are any anomalies in the frame. For example, computed frame score being lower than the predetermined frame threshold may indicate corruption in the frame.

FIG. 23C illustrates a transaction sequence 2360 for facilitating no-reference detection of anomalies in a sequence of multiple frames using deep learning according to one embodiment. For brevity, many of the details previously discussed with reference to FIGS. 1-23B may not be discussed or repeated hereafter. Any processes relating to transaction sequence may be performed by processing logic that may comprise hardware (e.g., circuitry, dedicated logic, programmable logic, etc.), software (such as instructions run on a processing device), or a combination thereof, as facilitated by no-reference mechanism 2010 and/or one or more of no-reference components 2020, 2030 of FIG. 20. The processes associated with transaction sequence may be illustrated or recited in linear sequences for brevity and clarity in presentation; however, it is contemplated that any number of them can be performed in parallel, asynchronously, or in different orders.

Transaction sequence 2360 begins at block 2361 with selection of a sequence of multiple frames detection of anomalies, corruption, etc., in this sequence of frames using deep learning as described with reference to FIG. 21. Transaction sequence 2360 continues with facilitating convolution of linear filter at block 2363, non-linear mapping at block 2365, and subsampling at block 2367. In one embodiment, transaction sequence 2360 continues with reducing the frame size of the frames in the sequence at block 2369, where the size may be reduced by splitting each frame in the sequence into several portions.

As illustrated, transaction sequence 2360 the repeats one or more of the above-mentioned processes using deep learning, such as facilitating convolution of linear filter at block 2371, non-linear mapping at block 2373, and subsampling at block 2375, and reducing the frame size of each frame in the sequence of frames at block 2377. At block 2379, in one embodiment, a sequence score (reflecting confidence based on the purity level of the sequence of frames) is computed and at block 2381, this sequence score is then compared with a predetermined confidence threshold appropriate for this sequence to determine any corruption in the sequence of frames. For example, certain level of discrepancy between the computed sequence score and the predetermined sequence threshold may indicate whether there are any anomalies in the sequence. For example, computed sequence score being lower than the predetermined sequence threshold may indicate corruption in the sequence of frames. In one embodiment, anomalies may be found in a sequence of frames even if none of the frames has any irregularities or anomalies.

References to “one embodiment”, “an embodiment”, “example embodiment”, “various embodiments”, etc., indicate that the embodiment(s) so described may include particular features, structures, or characteristics, but not every embodiment necessarily includes the particular features, structures, or characteristics. Further, some embodiments may have some, all, or none of the features described for other embodiments.

In the foregoing specification, embodiments have been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of embodiments as set forth in the appended claims. The Specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.

In the following description and claims, the term “coupled” along with its derivatives, may be used. “Coupled” is used to indicate that two or more elements co-operate or interact with each other, but they may or may not have intervening physical or electrical components between them.

As used in the claims, unless otherwise specified the use of the ordinal adjectives “first”, “second”, “third”, etc., to describe a common element, merely indicate that different instances of like elements are being referred to, and are not intended to imply that the elements so described must be in a given sequence, either temporally, spatially, in ranking, or in any other manner.

The following clauses and/or examples pertain to further embodiments or examples. Specifics in the examples may be used anywhere in one or more embodiments. The various features of the different embodiments or examples may be variously combined with some features included and others excluded to suit a variety of different applications. Examples may include subject matter such as a method, means for performing acts of the method, at least one machine-readable medium including instructions that, when performed by a machine cause the machine to perform acts of the method, or of an apparatus or system for facilitating hybrid communication according to embodiments and examples described herein.

Some embodiments pertain to Example 1 that includes an apparatus to facilitate visual anomaly detection without reference computing environments, the apparatus comprising: one or more processors to: select a frame from a sequence of multiple frames associated with a video stream captured by a camera; dynamically compute a frame confidence score for the frame based on frame training data associated with frame; and detect one or more anomalies in the frame when the frame confidence score is less than a frame confidence threshold associated with the frame, wherein detecting includes dynamically comparing the frame confidence score with the frame confidence threshold through inference using frame field data and the frame training data.

Example 2 includes the subject matter of Example 1, wherein the one or more processors are further to reduce a frame size of the frame by splitting the frame into multiple frame portions, wherein the one or more anomalies are detected in one or more of the multiple frame portions.

Example 3 includes the subject matter of Examples 1-2, wherein the one or more processors are further to select the sequence of multiple frames associated with the video stream.

Example 4 includes the subject matter of Examples 1-3, wherein the one or more processors are further to: dynamically compute a sequence confidence score for the sequence based on sequence training data associated with the sequence; and detect one or more anomalies in the sequence when the sequence confidence score is less than a sequence confidence threshold associated with the sequence, wherein detecting includes dynamically comparing the sequence confidence score with the sequence confidence threshold through inference using sequence field data and the sequence training data.

Example 5 includes the subject matter of Examples 1-4, wherein the one or more anomalies associated with the sequence are independent and irrespective of corruption status associated with each of the multiple frames of the sequence.

Example 6 includes the subject matter of Examples 1-5, wherein the one or more processors are further to reduce a sequence size of the sequence by splitting one or more of the multiple frames into smaller frames.

Example 7 includes the subject matter of Examples 1-6, wherein the one or more processors comprise a graphics processor hosting a no-reference anomaly detection circuitry, wherein the one or more processors further comprise an application processor co-located with the graphics processor on a common semiconductor package.

Some embodiments pertain to Example 8 that includes a method for facilitating visual anomaly detection without reference in computing environments, the method comprising: selecting, by one or more processors, a frame from a sequence of multiple frames associated with a video stream captured by a camera; dynamically computing, by the one or more processors, a frame confidence score for the frame based on frame training data associated with frame; and detecting, by the one or more processors, one or more anomalies in the frame when the frame confidence score is less than a frame confidence threshold associated with the frame, wherein detecting includes dynamically comparing the frame confidence score with the frame confidence threshold through inference using frame field data and the frame training data.

Example 9 includes the subject matter of Example 8, further comprising reducing a frame size of the frame by splitting the frame into multiple frame portions, wherein the one or more anomalies are detected in one or more of the multiple frame portions.

Example 10 includes the subject matter of Examples 8-9, further comprising selecting the sequence of multiple frames associated with the video stream.

Example 11 includes the subject matter of Examples 8-10, further comprising: dynamically computing a sequence confidence score for the sequence based on sequence training data associated with the sequence; and detecting one or more anomalies in the sequence when the sequence confidence score is less than a sequence confidence threshold associated with the sequence, wherein detecting includes dynamically comparing the sequence confidence score with the sequence confidence threshold through inference using sequence field data and the sequence training data.

Example 12 includes the subject matter of Examples 8-11, wherein the one or more anomalies associated with the sequence are independent and irrespective of corruption status associated with each of the multiple frames of the sequence.

Example 13 includes the subject matter of Examples 8-12, further comprising reducing a sequence size of the sequence by splitting one or more of the multiple frames into smaller frames.

Example 14 includes the subject matter of Examples 8-13, wherein the one or more processors comprise a graphics processor hosting a no-reference anomaly detection circuitry, wherein the one or more processors further comprise an application processor co-located with the graphics processor on a common semiconductor package.

Some embodiments pertain to Example 15 includes a data processing system comprising a processing device coupled to a memory, the processing device to: select a frame from a sequence of multiple frames associated with a video stream captured by a camera; dynamically compute a frame confidence score for the frame based on frame training data associated with frame; and detect one or more anomalies in the frame when the frame confidence score is less than a frame confidence threshold associated with the frame, wherein detecting includes dynamically comparing the frame confidence score with the frame confidence threshold through inference using frame field data and the frame training data.

Example 16 includes the subject matter of Example 15, wherein the processing device is further to reduce a frame size of the frame by splitting the frame into multiple frame portions, wherein the one or more anomalies are detected in one or more of the multiple frame portions.

Example 17 includes the subject matter of Examples 15-16, wherein the processing device is further to select the sequence of multiple frames associated with the video stream.

Example 18 includes the subject matter of Examples 15-17, wherein the processing device is further to: dynamically compute a sequence confidence score for the sequence based on sequence training data associated with the sequence; and detect one or more anomalies in the sequence when the sequence confidence score is less than a sequence confidence threshold associated with the sequence, wherein detecting includes dynamically comparing the sequence confidence score with the sequence confidence threshold through inference using sequence field data and the sequence training data.

Example 19 includes the subject matter of Examples 15-18, wherein the one or more anomalies associated with the sequence are independent and irrespective of corruption status associated with each of the multiple frames of the sequence.

Example 20 includes the subject matter of Examples 15-19, wherein the processing device is further to reduce a sequence size of the sequence by splitting one or more of the multiple frames into smaller frames.

Example 21 includes the subject matter of Examples 15-20, wherein the processing device comprises a graphics processor hosting a no-reference anomaly detection circuitry, wherein the processing device further comprises an application processor co-located with the graphics processor on a common semiconductor package.

Some embodiments pertain to Example 22 that includes an apparatus to facilitate visual anomaly detection without reference in computing environments, the apparatus comprising: means for selecting a frame from a sequence of multiple frames associated with a video stream captured by a camera; means for dynamically computing a frame confidence score for the frame based on frame training data associated with frame; and means for detecting one or more anomalies in the frame when the frame confidence score is less than a frame confidence threshold associated with the frame, wherein detecting includes dynamically comparing the frame confidence score with the frame confidence threshold through inference using frame field data and the frame training data.

Example 23 includes the subject matter of Example 22, further comprising means for reducing a frame size of the frame by splitting the frame into multiple frame portions, wherein the one or more anomalies are detected in one or more of the multiple frame portions.

Example 24 includes the subject matter of Examples 22-23, further comprising means for selecting the sequence of multiple frames associated with the video stream.

Example 25 includes the subject matter of Examples 22-24, further comprising: means for dynamically computing a sequence confidence score for the sequence based on sequence training data associated with the sequence; and detecting one or more anomalies in the sequence when the sequence confidence score is less than a sequence confidence threshold associated with the sequence, wherein detecting includes dynamically comparing the sequence confidence score with the sequence confidence threshold through inference using sequence field data and the sequence training data.

Example 26 includes the subject matter of Examples 22-25, wherein the one or more anomalies associated with the sequence are independent and irrespective of corruption status associated with each of the multiple frames of the sequence.

Example 27 includes the subject matter of Examples 22-26, further comprising means for reducing a sequence size of the sequence by splitting one or more of the multiple frames into smaller frames.

Example 28 includes the subject matter of Examples 22-27, wherein the apparatus comprises one or more processors including a graphics processor hosting a no-reference anomaly detection circuitry, wherein the one or more processors further include an application processor co-located with the graphics processor on a common semiconductor package.

Example 29 includes at least one non-transitory or tangible machine-readable medium comprising a plurality of instructions, when executed on a computing device, to implement or perform a method as claimed in any of claims or examples 8-14.

Example 30 includes at least one machine-readable medium comprising a plurality of instructions, when executed on a computing device, to implement or perform a method as claimed in any of claims or examples 8-14.

Example 31 includes a system comprising a mechanism to implement or perform a method as claimed in any of claims or examples 8-14.

Example 32 includes an apparatus comprising means for performing a method as claimed in any of claims or examples 8-14.

Example 33 includes a computing device arranged to implement or perform a method as claimed in any of claims or examples 8-14.

Example 34 includes a communications device arranged to implement or perform a method as claimed in any of claims or examples 8-14.

Example 35 includes at least one machine-readable medium comprising a plurality of instructions, when executed on a computing device, to implement or perform a method or realize an apparatus as claimed in any preceding claims.

Example 36 includes at least one non-transitory or tangible machine-readable medium comprising a plurality of instructions, when executed on a computing device, to implement or perform a method or realize an apparatus as claimed in any preceding claims.

Example 37 includes a system comprising a mechanism to implement or perform a method or realize an apparatus as claimed in any preceding claims.

Example 38 includes an apparatus comprising means to perform a method as claimed in any preceding claims.

Example 39 includes a computing device arranged to implement or perform a method or realize an apparatus as claimed in any preceding claims.

Example 40 includes a communications device arranged to implement or perform a method or realize an apparatus as claimed in any preceding claims.

The drawings and the forgoing description give examples of embodiments. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that one or more of the described elements may well be combined into a single functional element. Alternatively, certain elements may be split into multiple functional elements. Elements from one embodiment may be added to another embodiment. For example, orders of processes described herein may be changed and are not limited to the manner described herein. Moreover, the actions of any flow diagram need not be implemented in the order shown; nor do all of the acts necessarily need to be performed. Also, those acts that are not dependent on other acts may be performed in parallel with the other acts. The scope of embodiments is by no means limited by these specific examples. Numerous variations, whether explicitly given in the specification or not, such as differences in structure, dimension, and use of material, are possible. The scope of embodiments is at least as broad as given by the following claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. An apparatus comprising: one or more processors to: select a frame from a sequence of multiple frames associated with a video stream captured by a camera; dynamically compute a frame confidence score and a sequence confidence score, wherein the frame confidence score is computed for the frame based on frame training data associated with the frame, and wherein the sequence confidence score is computed for the sequence based on sequence training data associated with the sequence; and detect one or more anomalies in the frame when the frame confidence score is less than a frame confidence threshold associated with the frame, wherein detecting includes dynamically comparing the frame confidence score with the frame confidence threshold through inference based on frame field data and the frame training data.
 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are further to reduce a frame size of the frame by splitting the frame into multiple frame portions, wherein the one or more anomalies are detected in one or more of the multiple frame portions.
 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are further to select the sequence of multiple frames associated with the video stream.
 4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the one or more processors are further to: detect one or more anomalies in the sequence when the sequence confidence score is less than a sequence confidence threshold associated with the sequence, wherein detecting includes dynamically comparing the sequence confidence score with the sequence confidence threshold through inference using sequence field data and the sequence training data.
 5. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the one or more anomalies associated with the sequence are independent and irrespective of corruption status associated with each of the multiple frames of the sequence.
 6. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the one or more processors are further to reduce a sequence size of the sequence by splitting one or more of the multiple frames into smaller frames.
 7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors comprise a graphics processor hosting a no-reference anomaly detection circuitry, wherein the one or more processors further comprise an application processor co-located with the graphics processor on a common semiconductor package.
 8. A method comprising: selecting, by one or more processors, a frame from a sequence of multiple frames associated with a video stream captured by a camera; dynamically computing, by the one or more processors, a frame confidence score and a sequence confidence score, wherein the frame confidence score is computed for the frame based on frame training data associated with the frame, and wherein the sequence confidence score is computed for the sequence based on sequence training data associated with the sequence; and detecting, by the one or more processors, one or more anomalies in the frame when the frame confidence score is less than a frame confidence threshold associated with the frame, wherein detecting includes dynamically comparing the frame confidence score with the frame confidence threshold through inference based on frame field data and the frame training data.
 9. The method of claim 8, further comprising reducing a frame size of the frame by splitting the frame into multiple frame portions, wherein the one or more anomalies are detected in one or more of the multiple frame portions.
 10. The method of claim 8, further comprising selecting the sequence of multiple frames associated with the video stream.
 11. The method of claim 10, further comprising: detecting one or more anomalies in the sequence when the sequence confidence score is less than a sequence confidence threshold associated with the sequence, wherein detecting includes dynamically comparing the sequence confidence score with the sequence confidence threshold through inference using sequence field data and the sequence training data.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the one or more anomalies associated with the sequence are independent and irrespective of corruption status associated with each of the multiple frames of the sequence.
 13. The method of claim 11, further comprising reducing a sequence size of the sequence by splitting one or more of the multiple frames into smaller frames.
 14. The method of claim 8, wherein the one or more processors comprise a graphics processor hosting a no-reference anomaly detection circuitry, wherein the one or more processors further comprise an application processor co-located with the graphics processor on a common semiconductor package.
 15. At least one non-transitory machine-readable medium comprising a plurality of instructions which, when executed on a processing device, cause the processing device to perform operations comprising: selecting a frame from a sequence of multiple frames associated with a video stream captured by a camera; dynamically computing a frame confidence score and a sequence confidence score, wherein the frame confidence score is computed for the frame based on frame training data associated with the frame, and wherein the sequence confidence score is computed for the sequence based on sequence training data associated with the sequence; and detecting one or more anomalies in the frame when the frame confidence score is less than a frame confidence threshold associated with the frame, wherein detecting includes dynamically comparing the frame confidence score with the frame confidence threshold through inference based on frame field data and the frame training data.
 16. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 15, wherein the operations further comprise reducing a frame size of the frame by splitting the frame into multiple frame portions, wherein the one or more anomalies are detected in one or more of the multiple frame portions.
 17. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 15, wherein the operations further comprise selecting the sequence of multiple frames associated with the video stream.
 18. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the operations further comprise: detecting one or more anomalies in the sequence when the sequence confidence score is less than a sequence confidence threshold associated with the sequence, wherein detecting includes dynamically comparing the sequence confidence score with the sequence confidence threshold through inference using sequence field data and the sequence training data.
 19. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 18, wherein the one or more anomalies associated with the sequence are independent and irrespective of corruption status associated with each of the multiple frames of the sequence.
 20. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 18, wherein the operations further comprise reducing a sequence size of the sequence by splitting one or more of the multiple frames into smaller frames.
 21. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 15, wherein the processing device comprises a graphics processor hosting a no-reference anomaly detection circuitry, wherein the processing device further comprises an application processor co-located with the graphics processor on a common semiconductor package. 